Tertiary succession—do we really need the new term? Response to Rapson (2023)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985939%3A_____%2F23%3A00576529" target="_blank" >RIV/67985939:_____/23:00576529 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13892" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13892</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Tertiary succession—do we really need the new term? Response to Rapson (2023)
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The term tertiary succession which follows restoration measures was introduced recently as a complement to primary and secondary succession. However, its widespread use is not justified ecologically. It seems rather formalistic and does not contribute to a better linking of successional theory and practical ecological restoration. The arguments questioning the use of this term are summarized here.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Tertiary succession—do we really need the new term? Response to Rapson (2023)
Popis výsledku anglicky
The term tertiary succession which follows restoration measures was introduced recently as a complement to primary and secondary succession. However, its widespread use is not justified ecologically. It seems rather formalistic and does not contribute to a better linking of successional theory and practical ecological restoration. The arguments questioning the use of this term are summarized here.

Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Podobné výsledky(10)