Enacting Care

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F15%3A00444053" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/15:00444053 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2015.1022356" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2015.1022356</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2015.1022356" target="_blank" >10.1080/17496535.2015.1022356</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Enacting Care

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The ethics of care and the enactive approach in cognitive science have put forward a strong criticism of traditional individualistic and rationalistic accounts of autonomy, cognition and agency. Both approaches have suggested a revision of these notionsin terms of a relational ontology with an emphasis on the embodied and situated nature of cognition and agency. In academia, however, there has not yet been any attempt to focus on theoretical affinities between these two approaches or to consider the prospective consequences of merging their perspective. The paper aims at filling this gap. I argue that enactivism and the ethics of care can be mutually informative particularly in conceptualization of the processes of societal transformation and in grounding the strategies of addressing the exclusion and discrimination of people who are stigmatized as 'different' on the basis of their various disabilities.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Enacting Care

Popis výsledku anglicky

The ethics of care and the enactive approach in cognitive science have put forward a strong criticism of traditional individualistic and rationalistic accounts of autonomy, cognition and agency. Both approaches have suggested a revision of these notionsin terms of a relational ontology with an emphasis on the embodied and situated nature of cognition and agency. In academia, however, there has not yet been any attempt to focus on theoretical affinities between these two approaches or to consider the prospective consequences of merging their perspective. The paper aims at filling this gap. I argue that enactivism and the ethics of care can be mutually informative particularly in conceptualization of the processes of societal transformation and in grounding the strategies of addressing the exclusion and discrimination of people who are stigmatized as 'different' on the basis of their various disabilities.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GPP401%2F12%2FP544" target="_blank" >GPP401/12/P544: Empatie - mezi fenomenologií a neurovědami</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ethics and Social Welfare

ISSN

1749-6535

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

9

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

216-222

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—