Marci, Johannes Marcus

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F16%3A00463309" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/16:00463309 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_563-1" target="_blank" >http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_563-1</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Marci, Johannes Marcus

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Marcus Marci was a Czech physician (the personal physician of the emperor Ferdinand III) and polymath who significantly contributed to medicine, mechanics, optics, and chiefly to philosophy. As a physician he supported Paracelsian views; he contributed to medicine through his studies on the nature of epilepsy and its treatment. In mathematics, he was attempting (without remarkable success) to deal with the quadrature of a circle. More important are his two writings on natural philosophy Idearum operatricium idea (Prague 1635) and Philosophia vetus restituta Pán en pantón sive Philosophia vetus restituta (Prague 1662, 2. ed. Leipzig 1676) in which he defended hylozoism against the Jesuit scholastics of his time. Although hylozoism was not an exceptional conception in Renaissance philosophy, due to his Prague scholastic opponent Arriaga, Marcus formulated and justified this teaching with greater conceptual accuracy than was usual among other hylozoists of this time.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Marci, Johannes Marcus

Popis výsledku anglicky

Marcus Marci was a Czech physician (the personal physician of the emperor Ferdinand III) and polymath who significantly contributed to medicine, mechanics, optics, and chiefly to philosophy. As a physician he supported Paracelsian views; he contributed to medicine through his studies on the nature of epilepsy and its treatment. In mathematics, he was attempting (without remarkable success) to deal with the quadrature of a circle. More important are his two writings on natural philosophy Idearum operatricium idea (Prague 1635) and Philosophia vetus restituta Pán en pantón sive Philosophia vetus restituta (Prague 1662, 2. ed. Leipzig 1676) in which he defended hylozoism against the Jesuit scholastics of his time. Although hylozoism was not an exceptional conception in Renaissance philosophy, due to his Prague scholastic opponent Arriaga, Marcus formulated and justified this teaching with greater conceptual accuracy than was usual among other hylozoists of this time.

Druh

A - Audiovizuální tvorba

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GB14-37038G" target="_blank" >GB14-37038G: Mezi renesancí a barokem: Filosofie a vědění v českých zemích a jejich širší evropský kontext</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

ISBN

—

Místo vydání

—

Název nakladatele resp. objednatele

—

Verze

—

Identifikační číslo nosiče

—