Wyclif’s Early Reception in Bohemia and His Influence on the Thought Jerome of Prague

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F17%3A00474551" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/17:00474551 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Wyclif’s Early Reception in Bohemia and His Influence on the Thought Jerome of Prague

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article deals with the relationship between Jerome of Prague, a philosopher and a colleague of the church reformer Jan Hus, and the thought of John Wyclif. The first section of the essay presents the initial reception of Wyclif’s thought in Bohemia and its relation to the group of younger Czech masters at the Prague faculty of arts that included Hus and Jerome. The second section discusses contemporary sources related to Jerome’s attitude towards Wyclif, and demonstrates that according to Jerome’s own assertions, his reception of Wyclif’s thought was limited. The last section shows, on the basis of an analysis of Jerome’s texts, which of Wyclif's treatises influenced Jerome's texts. It also shows that although Wyclif’s doctrines significantly influenced the Prague philosopher, Jerome’s reception of these doctrines was far from absolute. There were other significant influences and sources Jerome did not find in Wyclif: for example Plato’s Timaeus and Calcidius’s commentary on it.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Wyclif’s Early Reception in Bohemia and His Influence on the Thought Jerome of Prague

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article deals with the relationship between Jerome of Prague, a philosopher and a colleague of the church reformer Jan Hus, and the thought of John Wyclif. The first section of the essay presents the initial reception of Wyclif’s thought in Bohemia and its relation to the group of younger Czech masters at the Prague faculty of arts that included Hus and Jerome. The second section discusses contemporary sources related to Jerome’s attitude towards Wyclif, and demonstrates that according to Jerome’s own assertions, his reception of Wyclif’s thought was limited. The last section shows, on the basis of an analysis of Jerome’s texts, which of Wyclif's treatises influenced Jerome's texts. It also shows that although Wyclif’s doctrines significantly influenced the Prague philosopher, Jerome’s reception of these doctrines was far from absolute. There were other significant influences and sources Jerome did not find in Wyclif: for example Plato’s Timaeus and Calcidius’s commentary on it.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GBP405%2F12%2FG148" target="_blank" >GBP405/12/G148: Kulturní kódy a jejich proměny v husitském období</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Europe after Wyclif

ISBN

978-0-8232-7442-0

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

89-114

Počet stran knihy

313

Název nakladatele

Fordham University Press

Místo vydání

New York

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

000403567100005