Expressivist Perspective on Logicality

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F17%3A00481649" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/17:00481649 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11210/17:10372230

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11787-017-0171-6" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11787-017-0171-6</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11787-017-0171-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11787-017-0171-6</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Expressivist Perspective on Logicality

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Various attempts at demarcating logic were undertaken, many of them based on specific understanding of how logical knowledge is formal and not material. MacFarlane has persuasively shown that general idea of formality of logic can be understood in various ways. I take two of the accounts of formality, namely the requirement of conservativity and the requirement of schematicity of logical vocabulary, into consideration as promising candidates to make the all too unclear notion of formality more precise and study to what degree they could be considered as either necessary or sufficient conditions for logicality of some piece of vocabulary. Finding both notion unsatisfactory, as they stand, I propose combining them and envisage a hierarchy of logicality of expressions of a given language. Such a hierarchy is complicated and not linear, yet still offers a valuable explication of both the range and pragmatic significance of logic, if we combine it with logical expressivism.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Expressivist Perspective on Logicality

Popis výsledku anglicky

Various attempts at demarcating logic were undertaken, many of them based on specific understanding of how logical knowledge is formal and not material. MacFarlane has persuasively shown that general idea of formality of logic can be understood in various ways. I take two of the accounts of formality, namely the requirement of conservativity and the requirement of schematicity of logical vocabulary, into consideration as promising candidates to make the all too unclear notion of formality more precise and study to what degree they could be considered as either necessary or sufficient conditions for logicality of some piece of vocabulary. Finding both notion unsatisfactory, as they stand, I propose combining them and envisage a hierarchy of logicality of expressions of a given language. Such a hierarchy is complicated and not linear, yet still offers a valuable explication of both the range and pragmatic significance of logic, if we combine it with logical expressivism.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-15645S" target="_blank" >GA17-15645S: Logické modely usuzování a argumentace v přirozeném jazyce</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Logica Universalis

ISSN

1661-8297

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

409-419

Kód UT WoS článku

000424430400001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85025087122