Parisian and Prague Quodlibeta Compared: The Transfer of the Quodlibetal Disputation between the Faculties and Jerome of Prague’s Struggle against the Thematic Limitations Imposed on the Faculty of Arts
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F18%3A00501851" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/18:00501851 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Parisian and Prague Quodlibeta Compared: The Transfer of the Quodlibetal Disputation between the Faculties and Jerome of Prague’s Struggle against the Thematic Limitations Imposed on the Faculty of Arts
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The first part of this chapter shows that although certain aspects of the course of the disputations de quolibet were similar in Paris and in Prague, there were substantial differences between the two university events, including the place of their performance and the structure of their proceedings. Both variants, however, were de quolibet, as the variety of their subject matter attests. The second part discusses also in connection with the quodlibets in Prague the thematic limitations imposed on the faculty of arts at both the universities. Based on university statutes and texts of masters including Pierre d’Ailly, Jean Buridan, Jean Gerson and Jerome of Prague, it shows that at least during the career of Jerome, in Prague there was probably a more liberal setting for philosophers than in Paris and several universities in the central European region.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Parisian and Prague Quodlibeta Compared: The Transfer of the Quodlibetal Disputation between the Faculties and Jerome of Prague’s Struggle against the Thematic Limitations Imposed on the Faculty of Arts
Popis výsledku anglicky
The first part of this chapter shows that although certain aspects of the course of the disputations de quolibet were similar in Paris and in Prague, there were substantial differences between the two university events, including the place of their performance and the structure of their proceedings. Both variants, however, were de quolibet, as the variety of their subject matter attests. The second part discusses also in connection with the quodlibets in Prague the thematic limitations imposed on the faculty of arts at both the universities. Based on university statutes and texts of masters including Pierre d’Ailly, Jean Buridan, Jean Gerson and Jerome of Prague, it shows that at least during the career of Jerome, in Prague there was probably a more liberal setting for philosophers than in Paris and several universities in the central European region.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/KJB900090903" target="_blank" >KJB900090903: Filosofická rovina učení Mistra Jeronýma Pražského v českém a evropském kontextu</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
What is New in the New Universities? Learning in Central Europe in the Late Middle Ages (1340-1500)
ISBN
978-83-7683-171-8
Počet stran výsledku
32
Strana od-do
325-356
Počet stran knihy
495
Název nakladatele
Wydavnictwo IFiS PAN
Místo vydání
Warszawa
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—