On the Political Aspects of Agnes Heller’s Ethical Thinking
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F20%3A00524745" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/20:00524745 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2020-0006" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2020-0006</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2020-0006" target="_blank" >10.1515/humaff-2020-0006</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
On the Political Aspects of Agnes Heller’s Ethical Thinking
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The author describes Heller’s concept of ethics as a “quasi-sphere” intersecting with various fields relating to human relationships. Special attention is paid to the axiological aspects of her concept of ethics and the relationship between virtues and responsibility. The author also seeks to show how Heller integrated a traditional philosophical question- the relationship between “is” and “ought to be”-into her concept of “radical philosophy” at an earlier stage in the development of her philosophy. She initially considered the relationship between “is” and “ought to be” to be contrasting. Later, when she had come to accept the political model of liberal capitalist society, the ideal of all-compassing equality became the ideal of “equality of opportunities”. The author interprets this shift as one in which the relationship becomes continual. He is also critical of Heller’s underestimation of the effect the “social a priori” has on the possibilities of human life.
Název v anglickém jazyce
On the Political Aspects of Agnes Heller’s Ethical Thinking
Popis výsledku anglicky
The author describes Heller’s concept of ethics as a “quasi-sphere” intersecting with various fields relating to human relationships. Special attention is paid to the axiological aspects of her concept of ethics and the relationship between virtues and responsibility. The author also seeks to show how Heller integrated a traditional philosophical question- the relationship between “is” and “ought to be”-into her concept of “radical philosophy” at an earlier stage in the development of her philosophy. She initially considered the relationship between “is” and “ought to be” to be contrasting. Later, when she had come to accept the political model of liberal capitalist society, the ideal of all-compassing equality became the ideal of “equality of opportunities”. The author interprets this shift as one in which the relationship becomes continual. He is also critical of Heller’s underestimation of the effect the “social a priori” has on the possibilities of human life.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Human Affairs
ISSN
1210-3055
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
30
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
60-71
Kód UT WoS článku
000507234000007
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85078210552