Rudolf Carnap’s Inferentialism

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F20%3A00524749" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/20:00524749 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36383-3_5" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36383-3_5</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36383-3_5" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-36383-3_5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Rudolf Carnap’s Inferentialism

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Carnap’s development from the “syntactic phase” of his Logical Syntax of Language to the “semantic phase” of his Introduction to Semantics and Meaning and Necessity is often seen as an awakening from a dogmatic semantics-blindness. In this paper we look at the development from a different visual angle, indicating that seeing it as simply a progress might be misleading. We point out that from the viewpoint of many contemporary philosophers it is no longer clear that meaning is not a matter of “syntax” in Carnap’s original sense of the word. Aside of this, Carnap’s contribution to the understanding of rules, and especially inferential rules, with respect to syntax, semantics, and language in general, was profound. Therefore, we suggest that Carnap’s investigations from his “syntactic phase” are much more interesting than even the later Carnap himself would have appreciated.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Rudolf Carnap’s Inferentialism

Popis výsledku anglicky

Carnap’s development from the “syntactic phase” of his Logical Syntax of Language to the “semantic phase” of his Introduction to Semantics and Meaning and Necessity is often seen as an awakening from a dogmatic semantics-blindness. In this paper we look at the development from a different visual angle, indicating that seeing it as simply a progress might be misleading. We point out that from the viewpoint of many contemporary philosophers it is no longer clear that meaning is not a matter of “syntax” in Carnap’s original sense of the word. Aside of this, Carnap’s contribution to the understanding of rules, and especially inferential rules, with respect to syntax, semantics, and language in general, was profound. Therefore, we suggest that Carnap’s investigations from his “syntactic phase” are much more interesting than even the later Carnap himself would have appreciated.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA13-21076S" target="_blank" >GA13-21076S: Základy logiky ve světle nových výsledků filosofie a vědy</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

The Vienna Circle in Czechoslovakia

ISBN

978-3-030-36382-6

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

97-109

Počet stran knihy

204

Název nakladatele

Springer

Místo vydání

Cham

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—