Althusser, Feuerbach and the Non-Identical Concept of the Body

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F20%3A00540612" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/20:00540612 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2019.1676950" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2019.1676950</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2019.1676950" target="_blank" >10.1080/14409917.2019.1676950</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Althusser, Feuerbach and the Non-Identical Concept of the Body

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article begins with a detailed analysis of Althusser’s criticism of Feuerbach as an ?ideologue? of the body. Althusser concentrates on the mirror structure of the subject and the object and on empiricism, which represents the ideological discourse. I argue that Althusser overlooked Feuerbach’s decisive revelations: a bodily materiality which corresponds to Adorno’s non-identical inner nature, and the ontological condensation of the human being, a process which generates the ?living reality? of the body. I show Feuerbach’s breakthrough reinterpretation of the Ground in Schelling’s concept of the object (God) that was identified with nature and represents the non-identical limitation of the subject. This limitation, which is connected to death, creates the difference between the ?living reality? of the body and bodily materiality as subjected by ideological discourses. I conclude that Feuerbach revealed a non-identical materiality of the body that evades both Althusserian interpellations and Foucauldian regulative practices.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Althusser, Feuerbach and the Non-Identical Concept of the Body

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article begins with a detailed analysis of Althusser’s criticism of Feuerbach as an ?ideologue? of the body. Althusser concentrates on the mirror structure of the subject and the object and on empiricism, which represents the ideological discourse. I argue that Althusser overlooked Feuerbach’s decisive revelations: a bodily materiality which corresponds to Adorno’s non-identical inner nature, and the ontological condensation of the human being, a process which generates the ?living reality? of the body. I show Feuerbach’s breakthrough reinterpretation of the Ground in Schelling’s concept of the object (God) that was identified with nature and represents the non-identical limitation of the subject. This limitation, which is connected to death, creates the difference between the ?living reality? of the body and bodily materiality as subjected by ideological discourses. I conclude that Feuerbach revealed a non-identical materiality of the body that evades both Althusserian interpellations and Foucauldian regulative practices.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Critical Horizons: a journal of philosophy and social theory

ISSN

1440-9917

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

21

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

49-62

Kód UT WoS článku

000490429700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85074363707