Czechoslovak Post-Stalinism: a Distinct Field of Socialist Visions

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F21%3A00547385" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/21:00547385 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.30965/18763308-48020004" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.30965/18763308-48020004</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.30965/18763308-48020004" target="_blank" >10.30965/18763308-48020004</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Czechoslovak Post-Stalinism: a Distinct Field of Socialist Visions

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Recent historical research has looked at post-Stalinism as a specific and distinct historical era. Whereas Anatoly Pinski points to the post-Stalinist emphasis on subjectivity, Pavel Kolář writes about post-Stalinist indecisiveness resulting from the tension between its inheritance from the past and an anticipated future. Having both approaches in mind, this article sheds light on the anticipatory character of post-Stalinist thought, which, by critically analyzing its present, aimed to achieve a socialist future. The opening part of the article articulates a theory of modernity, which is applied to the history of thought and is employed as a general framework for defining the post-Stalinist era. Second, the authors introduce the category of post-Stalinist reflexivity and analyze internal differentiation within the thought of the party intelligentsia, which led to the birth of various conceptions of socialism (an “internal plurality”). Third, the article analyzes humanist and techno-optimist thought in Czechoslovakia and demonstrates the future-oriented nature of post-Stalinism.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Czechoslovak Post-Stalinism: a Distinct Field of Socialist Visions

Popis výsledku anglicky

Recent historical research has looked at post-Stalinism as a specific and distinct historical era. Whereas Anatoly Pinski points to the post-Stalinist emphasis on subjectivity, Pavel Kolář writes about post-Stalinist indecisiveness resulting from the tension between its inheritance from the past and an anticipated future. Having both approaches in mind, this article sheds light on the anticipatory character of post-Stalinist thought, which, by critically analyzing its present, aimed to achieve a socialist future. The opening part of the article articulates a theory of modernity, which is applied to the history of thought and is employed as a general framework for defining the post-Stalinist era. Second, the authors introduce the category of post-Stalinist reflexivity and analyze internal differentiation within the thought of the party intelligentsia, which led to the birth of various conceptions of socialism (an “internal plurality”). Third, the article analyzes humanist and techno-optimist thought in Czechoslovakia and demonstrates the future-oriented nature of post-Stalinism.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

East Central Europe

ISSN

0094-3037

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

48

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2/3

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

30

Strana od-do

220-249

Kód UT WoS článku

000734911700004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85121266088