The Story of Dialectics and the Trickster of History

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F22%3A00560633" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/22:00560633 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.1.6" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.1.6</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.1.6" target="_blank" >10.19195/prt.2022.1.6</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Story of Dialectics and the Trickster of History

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Drawing on Hegel’s interpretation of narrative and Lyotard’s rejection of “grand” dialectical narratives, this paper addresses the relationship between emancipatory dialectics and narrative form. It begins by establishing the intimate connection between dialectical thought and narration. On this basis, the paper argues that varying conceptions of dialectics can be associated with varying structures of narrating history. Finally, the paper makes the case for identifying a specific narrative form adequate to the radical re-readings of Hegel that have replaced the perspective of the master (the subject privileged by a given system of historicity) with the perspective of the slave (who, while excluded from historicity, struggles against this exclusion). This narrative form corresponds to none of the classical Greek genres, it is best described as a trickster tale.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Story of Dialectics and the Trickster of History

Popis výsledku anglicky

Drawing on Hegel’s interpretation of narrative and Lyotard’s rejection of “grand” dialectical narratives, this paper addresses the relationship between emancipatory dialectics and narrative form. It begins by establishing the intimate connection between dialectical thought and narration. On this basis, the paper argues that varying conceptions of dialectics can be associated with varying structures of narrating history. Finally, the paper makes the case for identifying a specific narrative form adequate to the radical re-readings of Hegel that have replaced the perspective of the master (the subject privileged by a given system of historicity) with the perspective of the slave (who, while excluded from historicity, struggles against this exclusion). This narrative form corresponds to none of the classical Greek genres, it is best described as a trickster tale.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Praktyka teoretyczna

ISSN

2081-8130

e-ISSN

2081-8130

Svazek periodika

43

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

131-153

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85136193513