Lions of Ilion and Lions of Albion. The Trojan Myth in English heraldry of the 15th century
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F22%3A00586007" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/22:00586007 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.57632/QMan.2022.27.10" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.57632/QMan.2022.27.10</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.57632/QMan.2022.27.10" target="_blank" >10.57632/QMan.2022.27.10</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Lions of Ilion and Lions of Albion. The Trojan Myth in English heraldry of the 15th century
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Imaginary heraldry became an integral part of a narrative about the Trojan origin of the British insular realms (England, Scotland, and Wales) during the High and Late Middle Ages. An essential source of the Trojan origin in insular historiography is the Historia Regum Britanniae of Geoffrey of Monmouth. Although this source does not include heraldry material, it laid the foundations for the narrative uniting Troy and Britain. Successive authors working in Geoffrey’s tradition (e.g. John Hardyng’s Chronicle) developed the origo gentis story, and some of them incorporated the heraldic aspect of Troy. The basic proposition is a claim that the coats of arms of the Kingdoms of England, Scotland, and the Principality of Wales were seen in a specific context as the coats of arms derived from the sons of the founder of the ancient Kingdom of Britain, Brutus. This theory further describes Brutus and his sons as descendants of the Trojan kings. Thus, the whole concept of the coat of arms with the lion connecting ancient Troy, Brutus’ insular kingdom, and finally three insular realms, signals the antiquity and indivisibility of the island of Great Britain in a simple and understandable visual form.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Lions of Ilion and Lions of Albion. The Trojan Myth in English heraldry of the 15th century
Popis výsledku anglicky
Imaginary heraldry became an integral part of a narrative about the Trojan origin of the British insular realms (England, Scotland, and Wales) during the High and Late Middle Ages. An essential source of the Trojan origin in insular historiography is the Historia Regum Britanniae of Geoffrey of Monmouth. Although this source does not include heraldry material, it laid the foundations for the narrative uniting Troy and Britain. Successive authors working in Geoffrey’s tradition (e.g. John Hardyng’s Chronicle) developed the origo gentis story, and some of them incorporated the heraldic aspect of Troy. The basic proposition is a claim that the coats of arms of the Kingdoms of England, Scotland, and the Principality of Wales were seen in a specific context as the coats of arms derived from the sons of the founder of the ancient Kingdom of Britain, Brutus. This theory further describes Brutus and his sons as descendants of the Trojan kings. Thus, the whole concept of the coat of arms with the lion connecting ancient Troy, Brutus’ insular kingdom, and finally three insular realms, signals the antiquity and indivisibility of the island of Great Britain in a simple and understandable visual form.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Quaestiones medii aevi novae
ISSN
1427-4418
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
—
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
27
Stát vydavatele periodika
PL - Polská republika
Počet stran výsledku
16
Strana od-do
259-276
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—