Catalina González Quintero. Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant. A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics [Review]
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F23%3A00577680" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/23:00577680 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2023.a910752" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2023.a910752</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Catalina González Quintero. Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant. A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics [Review]
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Quintero wants to take the discussions of Academic skepticism beyond the field of empirical science and concentrate on the attitude of the skeptics towards metaphysics, her aim is to show how Cicero, Hume, and Kant used skeptical means to examine the justification of metaphysical claims and to determine, in this way, which resulting beliefs could be held non-dogmatically. Quintero encourages the reader to investigate how modified versions of ancient skeptical doctrines have continued to play a role in other historical periods and philosophical contexts, recognizing that the history of philosophy and contemporary philosophical debates are interconnected and form a living entity.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Catalina González Quintero. Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant. A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics [Review]
Popis výsledku anglicky
Quintero wants to take the discussions of Academic skepticism beyond the field of empirical science and concentrate on the attitude of the skeptics towards metaphysics, her aim is to show how Cicero, Hume, and Kant used skeptical means to examine the justification of metaphysical claims and to determine, in this way, which resulting beliefs could be held non-dogmatically. Quintero encourages the reader to investigate how modified versions of ancient skeptical doctrines have continued to play a role in other historical periods and philosophical contexts, recognizing that the history of philosophy and contemporary philosophical debates are interconnected and form a living entity.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů