Ontology of Play and the Ambivalence of Resilience
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F24%3A00597790" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/24:00597790 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350424661.0024" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350424661.0024</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350424661.0024" target="_blank" >10.5040/9781350424661.0024</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Ontology of Play and the Ambivalence of Resilience
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This chapter analyses the ontological implications of play and resilience, namely the “ontology of interactive emergence” developed in the framework of the resilience thinking and the ontology of play presented in the play-based cosmology developed by Eugen Fink. It presents play and resilience as essentially contested concepts and analyses the ways how can both play and resilience get instrumentalized. In resilience thinking the chapter discusses both system theory approaches and positive psychology approaches in order to show the resemblance with Fink’s ontology of play. The chapter argues that if resilience, that is nowadays very often connected to the questions of governmentality of the complex world of polycrisis, shall avoid the falling back into the modernistic scheme, it must remain radically playful in the sense of the play-based ontology proposed by Eugen Fink. The radicality of the playfulness consists in the character of the vital principle that is in Fink`s interpretation neither good nor bad - it presents itself as a refraction of actuality and non-actuality and, it guarantees that there will not be immanence without self-distance.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Ontology of Play and the Ambivalence of Resilience
Popis výsledku anglicky
This chapter analyses the ontological implications of play and resilience, namely the “ontology of interactive emergence” developed in the framework of the resilience thinking and the ontology of play presented in the play-based cosmology developed by Eugen Fink. It presents play and resilience as essentially contested concepts and analyses the ways how can both play and resilience get instrumentalized. In resilience thinking the chapter discusses both system theory approaches and positive psychology approaches in order to show the resemblance with Fink’s ontology of play. The chapter argues that if resilience, that is nowadays very often connected to the questions of governmentality of the complex world of polycrisis, shall avoid the falling back into the modernistic scheme, it must remain radically playful in the sense of the play-based ontology proposed by Eugen Fink. The radicality of the playfulness consists in the character of the vital principle that is in Fink`s interpretation neither good nor bad - it presents itself as a refraction of actuality and non-actuality and, it guarantees that there will not be immanence without self-distance.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
The Phenomenology of Play. Encountering Eugen Fink
ISBN
978-1-350-42463-0
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
137-146
Počet stran knihy
246
Název nakladatele
Bloomsbury Academic
Místo vydání
London
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—