Themistocles in Cicero’s Letter to Lucceius
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F24%3A00599818" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/24:00599818 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2024.6" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2024.6</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2024.6" target="_blank" >10.14712/24646830.2024.6</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Themistocles in Cicero’s Letter to Lucceius
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
After a brief introduction to modern literature on Cicero’s famous letter to Lucceius (Fam. V, 12 [SB 22]) and its importance for Cicero’s idea of history, the paper focuses on the two mentions of Themistocles in the letter. In both instances, the correctness of Cicero’s statements is hard to defend, and previous attempts to explain this have been unpersuasive. It is possible that Cicero was simply mistaken, but on balance it seems more likely that his mistakes were intentional, made to provoke Lucceius to correct him. Had Lucceius done so, Cicero could have claimed that Lucceius was rude, and used it as further leverage on Lucceius to deliver the laudatory monograph on Cicero’s conduct from his consulship up to his return from exile.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Themistocles in Cicero’s Letter to Lucceius
Popis výsledku anglicky
After a brief introduction to modern literature on Cicero’s famous letter to Lucceius (Fam. V, 12 [SB 22]) and its importance for Cicero’s idea of history, the paper focuses on the two mentions of Themistocles in the letter. In both instances, the correctness of Cicero’s statements is hard to defend, and previous attempts to explain this have been unpersuasive. It is possible that Cicero was simply mistaken, but on balance it seems more likely that his mistakes were intentional, made to provoke Lucceius to correct him. Had Lucceius done so, Cicero could have claimed that Lucceius was rude, and used it as further leverage on Lucceius to deliver the laudatory monograph on Cicero’s conduct from his consulship up to his return from exile.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60206 - Specific literatures
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Philologica.
ISSN
0567-8269
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
—
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
81-92
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—