Which Resilience? Thinking Democratic Subjectivity in the Polycrisis
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F24%3A00603558" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/24:00603558 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.10.5" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.10.5</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.10.5" target="_blank" >10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.10.5</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Which Resilience? Thinking Democratic Subjectivity in the Polycrisis
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In the context of the current polycrisis, Andreas Reckwitz suggests that instead of emphasizing progress, Western liberal democracies should cultivate resilience. The question is: which resilience? The prevailing theory of democratic resilience focuses on securing the “invariant core” of democratic institutions. This article shows why this approach is insufficient and discusses the advantages of the multisystemic approach. Democracy is here understood as a quality of the lived relational environment and a regime with social and ethical aspirations. Developing resilience in this context means nurturing the sources of democratic subjectivity and consistently opposing the inner and institutional violations in the society. As such resilience has nothing to do with invulnerability or protection against external threats. Instead it supports the resistance against the double binds caused inside democratic regimes by the neoliberal paradigm in the name of cultivating democratic agonism and transformation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Which Resilience? Thinking Democratic Subjectivity in the Polycrisis
Popis výsledku anglicky
In the context of the current polycrisis, Andreas Reckwitz suggests that instead of emphasizing progress, Western liberal democracies should cultivate resilience. The question is: which resilience? The prevailing theory of democratic resilience focuses on securing the “invariant core” of democratic institutions. This article shows why this approach is insufficient and discusses the advantages of the multisystemic approach. Democracy is here understood as a quality of the lived relational environment and a regime with social and ethical aspirations. Developing resilience in this context means nurturing the sources of democratic subjectivity and consistently opposing the inner and institutional violations in the society. As such resilience has nothing to do with invulnerability or protection against external threats. Instead it supports the resistance against the double binds caused inside democratic regimes by the neoliberal paradigm in the name of cultivating democratic agonism and transformation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LX22NPO5101" target="_blank" >LX22NPO5101: Národní institut pro výzkum socioekonomických dopadů nemocí a systémových rizik</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Filozofia
ISSN
0046-385X
e-ISSN
2585-7061
Svazek periodika
79
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
10
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
1129-1143
Kód UT WoS článku
001378618500004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85212630109