Morality vs. Politics as a Framing Problem. How (Not) to Misunderstand the Fight Against Climate Change

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F25%3A00645535" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/25:00645535 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10089-w" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10089-w</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10089-w" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11245-024-10089-w</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Morality vs. Politics as a Framing Problem. How (Not) to Misunderstand the Fight Against Climate Change

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper is guided by two research hypotheses: (1) In contemporary public discourse, many of the most urgent political problems are predominantly framed and understood in moral terms, (2) this shift in framing has far-reaching consequences, impeding our understanding of the underlying problems and their eventual solution. The two hypotheses are demonstrated using multiple examples, with the fight against climate change serving as the main case study. The moral framing (thinking in terms of individual actions, duties and obligations, blame and personal responsibility) is shown to crowd out political considerations (focused on institutions and policy), even when such moral considerations are either out of place or immaterial. Consequently, individual actions and responsibility are shown to be overemphasized in contemporary public discourse to such an extent that the viable political solutions are often discounted or overlooked.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Morality vs. Politics as a Framing Problem. How (Not) to Misunderstand the Fight Against Climate Change

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper is guided by two research hypotheses: (1) In contemporary public discourse, many of the most urgent political problems are predominantly framed and understood in moral terms, (2) this shift in framing has far-reaching consequences, impeding our understanding of the underlying problems and their eventual solution. The two hypotheses are demonstrated using multiple examples, with the fight against climate change serving as the main case study. The moral framing (thinking in terms of individual actions, duties and obligations, blame and personal responsibility) is shown to crowd out political considerations (focused on institutions and policy), even when such moral considerations are either out of place or immaterial. Consequently, individual actions and responsibility are shown to be overemphasized in contemporary public discourse to such an extent that the viable political solutions are often discounted or overlooked.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60500 - Other Humanities and the Arts

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EH22_008%2F0004595" target="_blank" >EH22_008/0004595: Za hranice bezpečnosti: role konfliktu v posilování odolnosti</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Topoi: an international review of philosophy

ISSN

0167-7411

e-ISSN

1572-8749

Svazek periodika

44

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

101-111

Kód UT WoS článku

001314804900002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105001086302