Mapping the geography of R&D: what can we learn for regional innovation policy in the Czech Republic and beyond?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985998%3A_____%2F14%3A00431612" target="_blank" >RIV/67985998:_____/14:00431612 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.806435" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.806435</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.806435" target="_blank" >10.1080/09654313.2013.806435</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Mapping the geography of R&D: what can we learn for regional innovation policy in the Czech Republic and beyond?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Administrative regions do not necessarily correspond to areas that are homogenous in terms of innovation intensity. Although this has been recognized in the literature, quantitative evidence that explicitly considers this problem is rare. Using spatial exploratory analysis on detailed regional data derived from a census of R&D performers in the Czech Republic, we identify local spatial clusters of R&D activities and assess the extent of their (tnis)match with administrative borders. Overall, the resultssupport the arguments for regionalization of innovation policy. However, the existing policy units do not appear well suited for this purpose. On one hand, there is a need for policy coordination between multiple administrative regions. On the other hand, however, there are diverse patterns within them. Similar problems are likely to haunt the regionalization process in many other countries, which is alarming, as the regional accent of innovation policies becomes ever more vehement over
Název v anglickém jazyce
Mapping the geography of R&D: what can we learn for regional innovation policy in the Czech Republic and beyond?
Popis výsledku anglicky
Administrative regions do not necessarily correspond to areas that are homogenous in terms of innovation intensity. Although this has been recognized in the literature, quantitative evidence that explicitly considers this problem is rare. Using spatial exploratory analysis on detailed regional data derived from a census of R&D performers in the Czech Republic, we identify local spatial clusters of R&D activities and assess the extent of their (tnis)match with administrative borders. Overall, the resultssupport the arguments for regionalization of innovation policy. However, the existing policy units do not appear well suited for this purpose. On one hand, there is a need for policy coordination between multiple administrative regions. On the other hand, however, there are diverse patterns within them. Similar problems are likely to haunt the regionalization process in many other countries, which is alarming, as the regional accent of innovation policies becomes ever more vehement over
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AH - Ekonomie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GAP402%2F10%2F2310" target="_blank" >GAP402/10/2310: Inovace, produktivita a politika: Co můžeme zjistit z mikrodat?</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Planning Studies
ISSN
0965-4313
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
22
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
9
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
1862-1878
Kód UT WoS článku
000341644400006
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—