The BRICS then and now. Some lessons from history
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985998%3A_____%2F20%3A00525448" target="_blank" >RIV/67985998:_____/20:00525448 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjce/57/1/57_1_1/_pdf/-char/en" target="_blank" >https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjce/57/1/57_1_1/_pdf/-char/en</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5760/jjce.57.1_1" target="_blank" >10.5760/jjce.57.1_1</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The BRICS then and now. Some lessons from history
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
I examine the growth experience of the current BRICS countries in the light of the experience of earlier BRICS-like countries (France, Germany, Italy, Russia and Japan) as well as of the settler economies (Argentina, Australia, Canada, the US and South Africa) using the developmental framework of Alexander Gerschenkron. I also examine the political implications for the BRICS countries of their economic growth. The economic analysis shows the possibility of a middle-income trap at all points in history, due in part to the inability of countries to modify their development strategies or to adopt appropriate policies: continuing to foster the acquisition of labor and capital is critical for growth. In the political sphere, economic development changes the constellation of political forces in a country and the smooth adjustment to new political realities is a key factor in sustaining rapid growth. Within this analytical framework, China and India seem the BRICS countries best poised for continuing their development path. However, the BRICS are unlikely to initiate fundamental changes in the global economic order.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The BRICS then and now. Some lessons from history
Popis výsledku anglicky
I examine the growth experience of the current BRICS countries in the light of the experience of earlier BRICS-like countries (France, Germany, Italy, Russia and Japan) as well as of the settler economies (Argentina, Australia, Canada, the US and South Africa) using the developmental framework of Alexander Gerschenkron. I also examine the political implications for the BRICS countries of their economic growth. The economic analysis shows the possibility of a middle-income trap at all points in history, due in part to the inability of countries to modify their development strategies or to adopt appropriate policies: continuing to foster the acquisition of labor and capital is critical for growth. In the political sphere, economic development changes the constellation of political forces in a country and the smooth adjustment to new political realities is a key factor in sustaining rapid growth. Within this analytical framework, China and India seem the BRICS countries best poised for continuing their development path. However, the BRICS are unlikely to initiate fundamental changes in the global economic order.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Japanese Journal of Comparative Economics
ISSN
1880-5647
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
57
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
JP - Japonsko
Počet stran výsledku
14
Strana od-do
1-14
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—