Investigations of Stacked DNA Base-Pair Steps: Highly Accurate Stacking Interaction Energies, Energy Decomposition, and Many-Body Stacking Effects
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081707%3A_____%2F19%3A00501549" target="_blank" >RIV/68081707:_____/19:00501549 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61989592:15310/19:73597467
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00643" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00643</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00643" target="_blank" >10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00643</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Investigations of Stacked DNA Base-Pair Steps: Highly Accurate Stacking Interaction Energies, Energy Decomposition, and Many-Body Stacking Effects
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The stacking energies of 10 unique B-DNA base-pair steps were calculated with highly accurate quantum chemistry and used as reference values in a thorough benchmark of (dispersion-corrected) DFT, wave function methods, tight-binding methods, and different force fields, including charge variants thereof. The reference values were computed using a focal-point energy function based on extrapolated explicitly correlated MP2-F12 and conventional CCSD(T) data at the triple-zeta level. A collection of 29 different density functionals, sometimes with multiple dispersion corrections (D3(BJ), D3M(BJ), and VV10) were evaluated, including recent functionals like B97M-V, omega B97M-V, and SCAN-D3(BJ), which perform excellently. The double-hybrid DSD-BLYP-NL was found to be the best DFT method. Common wave function methods (MP2, SCS-MP2, and MP2.5) and the SNS-MP2 protocol were tested as well, where only the latter and DLPNO-CCSD(T)/CBS were competitive with DFT. The tight-binding methods DFTB3-D3 and GFN-xTB revealed a comparatively low accuracy. The AMBER force field outperformed CHARMM and GROMOS but still showed systematic gas-phase overbinding, which could be traced back to the electrostatic term, as revealed by comparison of different sets of point charges. High-order SAPT, e.g., SAPT2 + 3 delta(MP2), was not only benchmarked but also used to study the nature of the stacking interactions to high accuracy. The delta(MP2) term turned out to be crucially important to reach high accuracy. Finally, we investigated four-body stacking effects with DLPNO-CCSD(T) and DFT, which were found to be significant and strongest for the CpC base-pair step where they reached almost 30% of the total stacking energy.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Investigations of Stacked DNA Base-Pair Steps: Highly Accurate Stacking Interaction Energies, Energy Decomposition, and Many-Body Stacking Effects
Popis výsledku anglicky
The stacking energies of 10 unique B-DNA base-pair steps were calculated with highly accurate quantum chemistry and used as reference values in a thorough benchmark of (dispersion-corrected) DFT, wave function methods, tight-binding methods, and different force fields, including charge variants thereof. The reference values were computed using a focal-point energy function based on extrapolated explicitly correlated MP2-F12 and conventional CCSD(T) data at the triple-zeta level. A collection of 29 different density functionals, sometimes with multiple dispersion corrections (D3(BJ), D3M(BJ), and VV10) were evaluated, including recent functionals like B97M-V, omega B97M-V, and SCAN-D3(BJ), which perform excellently. The double-hybrid DSD-BLYP-NL was found to be the best DFT method. Common wave function methods (MP2, SCS-MP2, and MP2.5) and the SNS-MP2 protocol were tested as well, where only the latter and DLPNO-CCSD(T)/CBS were competitive with DFT. The tight-binding methods DFTB3-D3 and GFN-xTB revealed a comparatively low accuracy. The AMBER force field outperformed CHARMM and GROMOS but still showed systematic gas-phase overbinding, which could be traced back to the electrostatic term, as revealed by comparison of different sets of point charges. High-order SAPT, e.g., SAPT2 + 3 delta(MP2), was not only benchmarked but also used to study the nature of the stacking interactions to high accuracy. The delta(MP2) term turned out to be crucially important to reach high accuracy. Finally, we investigated four-body stacking effects with DLPNO-CCSD(T) and DFT, which were found to be significant and strongest for the CpC base-pair step where they reached almost 30% of the total stacking energy.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10403 - Physical chemistry
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
ISSN
1549-9618
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
15
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
21
Strana od-do
95-115
Kód UT WoS článku
000455558200012
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—