A Comparative Analysis of Methods for Evaluation of ECG Signal Quality after Compression

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081731%3A_____%2F18%3A00493250" target="_blank" >RIV/68081731:_____/18:00493250 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216305:26220/18:PU128272

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1868519" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1868519</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1868519" target="_blank" >10.1155/2018/1868519</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A Comparative Analysis of Methods for Evaluation of ECG Signal Quality after Compression

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The assessment of ECG signal quality after compression is an essential part of the compression process. Compression facilitates the signal archiving, speeds up signal transmission, and reduces the energy consumption. Conversely, lossy compression distorts the signals. Therefore, it is necessary to express the compression performance through both compression efficiency and signal quality. This paper provides an overview of objective algorithms for the assessment of both ECG signal quality after compression and compression efficiency. In this area, there is a lack of standardization, and there is no extensive review as such. 40 methods were tested in terms of their suitability for quality assessment. For this purpose, the whole CSE database was used. The tested signals were compressed using an algorithm based on SPIHT with varying efficiency. As a reference, compressed signals were manually assessed by two experts and classified into three quality groups. Owing to the experts' classification, we determined corresponding ranges of selected quality evaluation methods' values. The suitability of the methods for quality assessment was evaluated based on five criteria. For the assessment of ECG signal quality after compression, we recommend using a combination of these methods: PSim SDNN, QS, SNR1, MSE, PRDN1, MAX, STDERR, and WEDD SWT.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A Comparative Analysis of Methods for Evaluation of ECG Signal Quality after Compression

Popis výsledku anglicky

The assessment of ECG signal quality after compression is an essential part of the compression process. Compression facilitates the signal archiving, speeds up signal transmission, and reduces the energy consumption. Conversely, lossy compression distorts the signals. Therefore, it is necessary to express the compression performance through both compression efficiency and signal quality. This paper provides an overview of objective algorithms for the assessment of both ECG signal quality after compression and compression efficiency. In this area, there is a lack of standardization, and there is no extensive review as such. 40 methods were tested in terms of their suitability for quality assessment. For this purpose, the whole CSE database was used. The tested signals were compressed using an algorithm based on SPIHT with varying efficiency. As a reference, compressed signals were manually assessed by two experts and classified into three quality groups. Owing to the experts' classification, we determined corresponding ranges of selected quality evaluation methods' values. The suitability of the methods for quality assessment was evaluated based on five criteria. For the assessment of ECG signal quality after compression, we recommend using a combination of these methods: PSim SDNN, QS, SNR1, MSE, PRDN1, MAX, STDERR, and WEDD SWT.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20601 - Medical engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

BioMed Research International

ISSN

2314-6133

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2018

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

JUL

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

1-26

Kód UT WoS článku

000439226000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85050985052