Orthogonal-compatibility effects confound automatic imitation: implications for measuring self–other distinction
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F17%3A00484543" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/17:00484543 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14740/17:00095169
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0814-x" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0814-x</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0814-x" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00426-016-0814-x</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Orthogonal-compatibility effects confound automatic imitation: implications for measuring self–other distinction
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Accurate distinction between self and other representations is fundamental to a range of social cognitive capacities, and understanding individual differences in this ability is an important aim for psychological research. This demands accurate measures of self–other distinction (SOD). The present study examined an experimental paradigm employed frequently to measure SOD in the action domain, specifically, we evaluated the rotated finger-action stimuli used increasingly to measure automatic imitation (AI). To assess the suitability of these stimuli, we compared AI elicited by different action stimuli to the performance on a perspective-taking task believed to measure SOD in the perception domain. In two separate experiments we reveal three important findings: firstly, we demonstrate a strong confounding influence of orthogonalcompatibility effects on AI elicited by certain rotated stimuli. Second, we demonstrate the potential for this confounding influence to mask important relationships between AI and other measures of SOD, we observed a relationship between AI and perspective-taking performance only when the former was measured in isolation of orthogonality compatibility. Thirdly, we observed a relationship between these two performance measures only in a sub-group of individuals exhibiting a pure form of AI.nFurthermore, this relationship revealed a self-bias in SOD—reduced AI was associated with increased egocentric misattributions in perspective taking. Together, our findings identify an important methodological consideration for measures of AI and extend previous research by showing an egocentric style of SOD across action and perception domains.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Orthogonal-compatibility effects confound automatic imitation: implications for measuring self–other distinction
Popis výsledku anglicky
Accurate distinction between self and other representations is fundamental to a range of social cognitive capacities, and understanding individual differences in this ability is an important aim for psychological research. This demands accurate measures of self–other distinction (SOD). The present study examined an experimental paradigm employed frequently to measure SOD in the action domain, specifically, we evaluated the rotated finger-action stimuli used increasingly to measure automatic imitation (AI). To assess the suitability of these stimuli, we compared AI elicited by different action stimuli to the performance on a perspective-taking task believed to measure SOD in the perception domain. In two separate experiments we reveal three important findings: firstly, we demonstrate a strong confounding influence of orthogonalcompatibility effects on AI elicited by certain rotated stimuli. Second, we demonstrate the potential for this confounding influence to mask important relationships between AI and other measures of SOD, we observed a relationship between AI and perspective-taking performance only when the former was measured in isolation of orthogonality compatibility. Thirdly, we observed a relationship between these two performance measures only in a sub-group of individuals exhibiting a pure form of AI.nFurthermore, this relationship revealed a self-bias in SOD—reduced AI was associated with increased egocentric misattributions in perspective taking. Together, our findings identify an important methodological consideration for measures of AI and extend previous research by showing an egocentric style of SOD across action and perception domains.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung
ISSN
0340-0727
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
81
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
14
Strana od-do
1152-1165
Kód UT WoS článku
000413032800005
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84991575844