How Czecho-Slovakia Bounces Back: Population-Based Validation of the Brief Resilience Scale in Two Central European Countries

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F22%3A00546340" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/22:00546340 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/61989592:15260/22:73609659

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00332941211029619" target="_blank" >https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00332941211029619</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00332941211029619" target="_blank" >10.1177/00332941211029619</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

How Czecho-Slovakia Bounces Back: Population-Based Validation of the Brief Resilience Scale in Two Central European Countries

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objective In recent years, resilience has become a focus of research in the medical and behavioral sciences. The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) was developed to assess the individual ability to recover from stress ('to bounce back') after experiencing adversities. The aim of the study was to validate the Czech and Slovak versions of the BRS. Methods A representative sample of the Czech and Slovak populations (N-CZ = 1800, mean age M-CZ = 46.6, SDCZ = 17.4, 48.7% of men, N-SK = 1018, mean age M-SK = 46.2, SDSK = 16.6, 48.7% men) completed a survey assessing their health and well-being. Several confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models of the BRS were compared to find the best fit. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients of reliability were evaluated. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating resilience (BRS), physical and mental well-being (SF-8) and psychopathology symptoms (BSI-53). Differences in gender and age groups were appraised. Results A single-factor model with method effects on the reverse items was evaluated to best fit the data in both the Czech and Slovak samples (chi(2)(CZ)(6) = 39.0, p < 0.001, CFICZ = 0.998, TLICZ = 0.995, RMSEA(CZ) = 0.055, SRMRCZ = 0.024, chi(2)(SK)(6) = 23.9, p < 0.001, CFISK = 0.998, TLISK = 0.995, RMSEA(SK) = 0.054, SRMRSK = 0.009). The reliability was high in both samples (alpha(CZ) = 0.80, omega(CZ) = 0.85, alpha(SK) = 0.86, omega(SK) = 0.91). The BRS was positively associated with physical and mental well-being and negatively associated with somatization, depression and anxiety. In both countries, a lower BRS score was associated with higher age. Czech men reported significantly higher BRS scores than women. No significant difference was found in the mean BRS scores between the two countries. Conclusion This study provides evidence of good psychometric properties, reliability and validity of the Czech and Slovak adaptations of the BRS.

Název v anglickém jazyce

How Czecho-Slovakia Bounces Back: Population-Based Validation of the Brief Resilience Scale in Two Central European Countries

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objective In recent years, resilience has become a focus of research in the medical and behavioral sciences. The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) was developed to assess the individual ability to recover from stress ('to bounce back') after experiencing adversities. The aim of the study was to validate the Czech and Slovak versions of the BRS. Methods A representative sample of the Czech and Slovak populations (N-CZ = 1800, mean age M-CZ = 46.6, SDCZ = 17.4, 48.7% of men, N-SK = 1018, mean age M-SK = 46.2, SDSK = 16.6, 48.7% men) completed a survey assessing their health and well-being. Several confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models of the BRS were compared to find the best fit. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients of reliability were evaluated. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating resilience (BRS), physical and mental well-being (SF-8) and psychopathology symptoms (BSI-53). Differences in gender and age groups were appraised. Results A single-factor model with method effects on the reverse items was evaluated to best fit the data in both the Czech and Slovak samples (chi(2)(CZ)(6) = 39.0, p < 0.001, CFICZ = 0.998, TLICZ = 0.995, RMSEA(CZ) = 0.055, SRMRCZ = 0.024, chi(2)(SK)(6) = 23.9, p < 0.001, CFISK = 0.998, TLISK = 0.995, RMSEA(SK) = 0.054, SRMRSK = 0.009). The reliability was high in both samples (alpha(CZ) = 0.80, omega(CZ) = 0.85, alpha(SK) = 0.86, omega(SK) = 0.91). The BRS was positively associated with physical and mental well-being and negatively associated with somatization, depression and anxiety. In both countries, a lower BRS score was associated with higher age. Czech men reported significantly higher BRS scores than women. No significant difference was found in the mean BRS scores between the two countries. Conclusion This study provides evidence of good psychometric properties, reliability and validity of the Czech and Slovak adaptations of the BRS.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-18964S" target="_blank" >GA19-18964S: Souvislost závažných životních událostí v průběhu života, nejisté vztahové vazby v důsledku traumatizace v dětství a resilience se zdravím</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Psychological Reports

ISSN

0033-2941

e-ISSN

1558-691X

Svazek periodika

125

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

2807-2827

Kód UT WoS článku

000680613000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85108998460