Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Thinking like a patriot: Criticising the country and the nation is linked to the differences in thinking style and cognitive ability

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F22%3A00569622" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/22:00569622 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111670" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111670</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111670" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.paid.2022.111670</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Thinking like a patriot: Criticising the country and the nation is linked to the differences in thinking style and cognitive ability

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Some forms of national identification facilitate criticism of one's own country and nation, whereas others prevent it. The critical form of national identification – constructive patriotism – is characterized by the willingness to criticise the group in order to improve it. The uncritical form of national identification – glorification – is characterized by seeing the group as superior to others and by intolerance of criticism of the group. We used dual-process theories to examine whether differences in thinking style and cognitive ability help predict the emergence of the critical and uncritical form of national identification. We ran three correlational studies (total N = 2509) in Poland including two samples representative of Polish society. We ran an internal meta-analysis to summarise the obtained results from all studies. We found that constructive patriotism was positively linked with need for cognition (i.e., the willingness to engage in slow, effortful information processing, for the random effect model r = 0.18). Constructive patriotism was also positively linked with cognitive ability (r = 0.07). In contrast, glorification was negatively associated with need for cognition (r = -0.26) and cognitive ability (r = -0.09). Glorification was also positively linked with faith in intuition (r = 0.14).

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Thinking like a patriot: Criticising the country and the nation is linked to the differences in thinking style and cognitive ability

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Some forms of national identification facilitate criticism of one's own country and nation, whereas others prevent it. The critical form of national identification – constructive patriotism – is characterized by the willingness to criticise the group in order to improve it. The uncritical form of national identification – glorification – is characterized by seeing the group as superior to others and by intolerance of criticism of the group. We used dual-process theories to examine whether differences in thinking style and cognitive ability help predict the emergence of the critical and uncritical form of national identification. We ran three correlational studies (total N = 2509) in Poland including two samples representative of Polish society. We ran an internal meta-analysis to summarise the obtained results from all studies. We found that constructive patriotism was positively linked with need for cognition (i.e., the willingness to engage in slow, effortful information processing, for the random effect model r = 0.18). Constructive patriotism was also positively linked with cognitive ability (r = 0.07). In contrast, glorification was negatively associated with need for cognition (r = -0.26) and cognitive ability (r = -0.09). Glorification was also positively linked with faith in intuition (r = 0.14).

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Personality and Individual Differences

  • ISSN

    0191-8869

  • e-ISSN

    1873-3549

  • Svazek periodika

    195

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    září

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    111670

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000821656500005

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85129238235