Gaze coherence reveals distinct tracking strategies in multiple object and multiple identity tracking

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F24%3A00578243" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/24:00578243 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13423-023-02417-9" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13423-023-02417-9</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02417-9" target="_blank" >10.3758/s13423-023-02417-9</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Gaze coherence reveals distinct tracking strategies in multiple object and multiple identity tracking

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In dynamic environments, a central task of the attentional system is to keep track of objects changing their spatial location over time. In some instances, it is sufficient to track only the spatial locations of moving objects (i.e., multiple object tracking, MOT). In other instances, however, it is also important to maintain distinct identities of moving objects (i.e., multiple identity tracking, MIT). Despite previous research, it is not clear whether MOT and MIT performance emerge from the same tracking mechanism. In the present report, we study gaze coherence (i.e., the extent to which participants repeat their gaze behaviour when tracking the same object locations twice) across repeated MOT and MIT trials. We observed more substantial gaze coherence in repeated MOT trials compared to the repeated MIT trials or mixed MOT-MIT trial pairs. A subsequent simulation study suggests that MOT is based more on a grouping mechanism than MIT, whereas MIT is based more on a target-jumping mechanism than MOT. It thus appears unlikely that MOT and MIT emerge from the same basic tracking mechanism.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Gaze coherence reveals distinct tracking strategies in multiple object and multiple identity tracking

Popis výsledku anglicky

In dynamic environments, a central task of the attentional system is to keep track of objects changing their spatial location over time. In some instances, it is sufficient to track only the spatial locations of moving objects (i.e., multiple object tracking, MOT). In other instances, however, it is also important to maintain distinct identities of moving objects (i.e., multiple identity tracking, MIT). Despite previous research, it is not clear whether MOT and MIT performance emerge from the same tracking mechanism. In the present report, we study gaze coherence (i.e., the extent to which participants repeat their gaze behaviour when tracking the same object locations twice) across repeated MOT and MIT trials. We observed more substantial gaze coherence in repeated MOT trials compared to the repeated MIT trials or mixed MOT-MIT trial pairs. A subsequent simulation study suggests that MOT is based more on a grouping mechanism than MIT, whereas MIT is based more on a target-jumping mechanism than MOT. It thus appears unlikely that MOT and MIT emerge from the same basic tracking mechanism.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-07690S" target="_blank" >GA19-07690S: Sledování objektů v pohybu – identita, nejistota a vizuálně rozmanité prostředí</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

ISSN

1069-9384

e-ISSN

1531-5320

Svazek periodika

31

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

1280-1289

Kód UT WoS článku

001098594600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85176125633