Anger and disgust shape judgments of social sanctions across cultures, especially in high individual autonomy societies

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F24%3A00585080" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/24:00585080 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-55815-x" target="_blank" >https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-55815-x</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55815-x" target="_blank" >10.1038/s41598-024-55815-x</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Anger and disgust shape judgments of social sanctions across cultures, especially in high individual autonomy societies

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

When someone violates a social norm, others may think that some sanction would be appropriate. We examine how the experience of emotions like anger and disgust relate to the judged appropriateness of sanctions, in a pre-registered analysis of data from a large-scale study in 56 societies. Across the world, we find that individuals who experience anger and disgust over a norm violation are more likely to endorse confrontation, ostracism and, to a smaller extent, gossip. Moreover, we find that the experience of anger is consistently the strongest predictor of judgments of confrontation, compared to other emotions. Although the link between state-based emotions and judgments may seem universal, its strength varies across countries. Aligned with theoretical predictions, this link is stronger in societies, and among individuals, that place higher value on individual autonomy. Thus, autonomy values may increase the role that emotions play in guiding judgments of social sanctions.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Anger and disgust shape judgments of social sanctions across cultures, especially in high individual autonomy societies

Popis výsledku anglicky

When someone violates a social norm, others may think that some sanction would be appropriate. We examine how the experience of emotions like anger and disgust relate to the judged appropriateness of sanctions, in a pre-registered analysis of data from a large-scale study in 56 societies. Across the world, we find that individuals who experience anger and disgust over a norm violation are more likely to endorse confrontation, ostracism and, to a smaller extent, gossip. Moreover, we find that the experience of anger is consistently the strongest predictor of judgments of confrontation, compared to other emotions. Although the link between state-based emotions and judgments may seem universal, its strength varies across countries. Aligned with theoretical predictions, this link is stronger in societies, and among individuals, that place higher value on individual autonomy. Thus, autonomy values may increase the role that emotions play in guiding judgments of social sanctions.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA23-06170S" target="_blank" >GA23-06170S: Role různých typů sociálních norem ve zlepšování konfliktních meziskupinových vztahů</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Scientific Reports

ISSN

2045-2322

e-ISSN

2045-2322

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

5591

Kód UT WoS článku

001185083700067

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85187119651