Turning a Blind Eye to Climate Change: Moral Disengagement and Negative Climate Emotions as Drivers of the Green Gap
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F25%3A00642086" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/25:00642086 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14560/25:00142582
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.70203" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.70203</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/casp.70203" target="_blank" >10.1002/casp.70203</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Turning a Blind Eye to Climate Change: Moral Disengagement and Negative Climate Emotions as Drivers of the Green Gap
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The primary aim of the current study was to investigate whether moral disengagement and associated negative emotions (guilt, shame and anxiety) could explain the green gap, that is, the disparity between environmental values or climate concern and pro-environmental behaviour. The secondary aim was to test an awareness-empowerment and a social norm intervention as two ways to enhance pro-environmental behaviour by reducing moral disengagement. First, in a large cross-sectional Study 1 (N = 1233), we investigated moral disengagement and negative climate emotions as serial mediators of the relationship between environmental values, as well as climate concern, and pro-environmental behaviour. Then, in a two-wave longitudinal Study 2 (N = 1308), we attempted to reduce moral disengagement using either an awareness-empowerment or a social norms intervention. The results of the two studies showed that both environmental values and climate concern predicted pro-environmental behaviour and this was partially mediated by lower moral disengagement and higher experienced negative emotions. Also, we found awareness-empowerment, but not social norms, intervention to be effective in reducing moral disengagement and, indirectly, motivating pro-environmental behaviour. The study provides persuasive evidence that moral disengagement contributes to the green gap and that interventions aimed at its reduction constitute an effective way of motivating pro-environmental behaviour. Please refer to the Supporting Information section to find this article's.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Turning a Blind Eye to Climate Change: Moral Disengagement and Negative Climate Emotions as Drivers of the Green Gap
Popis výsledku anglicky
The primary aim of the current study was to investigate whether moral disengagement and associated negative emotions (guilt, shame and anxiety) could explain the green gap, that is, the disparity between environmental values or climate concern and pro-environmental behaviour. The secondary aim was to test an awareness-empowerment and a social norm intervention as two ways to enhance pro-environmental behaviour by reducing moral disengagement. First, in a large cross-sectional Study 1 (N = 1233), we investigated moral disengagement and negative climate emotions as serial mediators of the relationship between environmental values, as well as climate concern, and pro-environmental behaviour. Then, in a two-wave longitudinal Study 2 (N = 1308), we attempted to reduce moral disengagement using either an awareness-empowerment or a social norms intervention. The results of the two studies showed that both environmental values and climate concern predicted pro-environmental behaviour and this was partially mediated by lower moral disengagement and higher experienced negative emotions. Also, we found awareness-empowerment, but not social norms, intervention to be effective in reducing moral disengagement and, indirectly, motivating pro-environmental behaviour. The study provides persuasive evidence that moral disengagement contributes to the green gap and that interventions aimed at its reduction constitute an effective way of motivating pro-environmental behaviour. Please refer to the Supporting Information section to find this article's.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
ISSN
1052-9284
e-ISSN
1099-1298
Svazek periodika
35
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
e70203
Kód UT WoS článku
001616498900001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105021993472