At the edge: Acheulean in the middle of Europe

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081758%3A_____%2F18%3A00500153" target="_blank" >RIV/68081758:_____/18:00500153 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14310/18:00104444

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.26720/anthro.17.09.19.1" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.26720/anthro.17.09.19.1</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.26720/anthro.17.09.19.1" target="_blank" >10.26720/anthro.17.09.19.1</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

At the edge: Acheulean in the middle of Europe

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Whereas Africa clearly represents the core area of the Acheulean, Eurasia was occupied by this technocomplex only partly. In present-day Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland the Acheulean creates a kind of eastern-exposed “peninsula” of the southwest European centers. Within the loess stratigraphies, patterns of prepared core technology first occured as early as MIS 10 (Horky nad Jizerou) and individual Acheulean tool-types may possibly date to MIS 7 and 6 (Letky nad Vltavou, Předmostí?), but large and complex Acheulean assemblages originate from surface surveys only (Bečov II, IV, Stvolínky I–II). The Early Acheulean (with individual bifaces in context of various pebble and flake industries) is scarcely represented but wide-spread over central Europe, whereas the Evolved Acheulean (with Levallois technology) is more coherent, more dependent on certain raw materials (quartzite/flint) and its boundaries are more distinct. The paper also mentions the discrepancy between paleogeography of Acheulean techno/typology and the fossil human record.

Název v anglickém jazyce

At the edge: Acheulean in the middle of Europe

Popis výsledku anglicky

Whereas Africa clearly represents the core area of the Acheulean, Eurasia was occupied by this technocomplex only partly. In present-day Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland the Acheulean creates a kind of eastern-exposed “peninsula” of the southwest European centers. Within the loess stratigraphies, patterns of prepared core technology first occured as early as MIS 10 (Horky nad Jizerou) and individual Acheulean tool-types may possibly date to MIS 7 and 6 (Letky nad Vltavou, Předmostí?), but large and complex Acheulean assemblages originate from surface surveys only (Bečov II, IV, Stvolínky I–II). The Early Acheulean (with individual bifaces in context of various pebble and flake industries) is scarcely represented but wide-spread over central Europe, whereas the Evolved Acheulean (with Levallois technology) is more coherent, more dependent on certain raw materials (quartzite/flint) and its boundaries are more distinct. The paper also mentions the discrepancy between paleogeography of Acheulean techno/typology and the fossil human record.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60102 - Archaeology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Anthropologie

ISSN

0323-1119

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

56

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

163-172

Kód UT WoS článku

000482810600003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85056605180