Wild or cultivated? a study of Vitis sylvestris in natura in Slovakia and implications for archaeology and archaeobotany (morphometric approach)
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081758%3A_____%2F23%3A00570546" target="_blank" >RIV/68081758:_____/23:00570546 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00334-023-00909-1" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00334-023-00909-1</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00334-023-00909-1" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00334-023-00909-1</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Wild or cultivated? a study of Vitis sylvestris in natura in Slovakia and implications for archaeology and archaeobotany (morphometric approach)
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The archaeobotanical identification of Vitis pips, which is often based only on visual assessment of the finds or on morphometric methods, is problematic. The problem of distinguishing wild from domesticated strains arises especially in the differentiation of early cultivars. Correct identification often fails even when mathematical methods based on dimensional measurements are used. To verify the success of two classification methods commonly used in archaeology, their procedures were applied to modern pips of wild Vitis sylvestris grown in natura in Slovakia, coming from different localities and with different numbers of pips. The results of these measurements were concordant with archaeobotanical findings of grapevine pips from the Great Moravian site of Mikulčice-Valy situated in the region of South Moravia (Czech Republic). The results show that traditional methods have difficulty in correctly classifying pips from fruits with more than one pip and, to a lesser extent, pips of fruits from sun-bleached stands. These grape species tend to be classified as cultivated. Thanks to the results on the error rate of morphometric methods, it is also possible to characterize the archaeobotanical finds from Mikulčice, which were defined as cultivated.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Wild or cultivated? a study of Vitis sylvestris in natura in Slovakia and implications for archaeology and archaeobotany (morphometric approach)
Popis výsledku anglicky
The archaeobotanical identification of Vitis pips, which is often based only on visual assessment of the finds or on morphometric methods, is problematic. The problem of distinguishing wild from domesticated strains arises especially in the differentiation of early cultivars. Correct identification often fails even when mathematical methods based on dimensional measurements are used. To verify the success of two classification methods commonly used in archaeology, their procedures were applied to modern pips of wild Vitis sylvestris grown in natura in Slovakia, coming from different localities and with different numbers of pips. The results of these measurements were concordant with archaeobotanical findings of grapevine pips from the Great Moravian site of Mikulčice-Valy situated in the region of South Moravia (Czech Republic). The results show that traditional methods have difficulty in correctly classifying pips from fruits with more than one pip and, to a lesser extent, pips of fruits from sun-bleached stands. These grape species tend to be classified as cultivated. Thanks to the results on the error rate of morphometric methods, it is also possible to characterize the archaeobotanical finds from Mikulčice, which were defined as cultivated.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60102 - Archaeology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA17-01878S" target="_blank" >GA17-01878S: Životní styl a identita velkomoravské aristokracie: archeologická a bioarcheologická analýza dokladů nejvyšších elit v Mikulčicích</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
ISSN
0939-6314
e-ISSN
1617-6278
Svazek periodika
32
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
321-337
Kód UT WoS článku
000946856100001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85149746903