Methodological issues affecting the study of fish parasites. II. Sampling method affects ectoparasite studies

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081766%3A_____%2F16%3A00462476" target="_blank" >RIV/68081766:_____/16:00462476 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/dao03035" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/dao03035</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/dao03035" target="_blank" >10.3354/dao03035</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Methodological issues affecting the study of fish parasites. II. Sampling method affects ectoparasite studies

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this study, we assessed the impact of sampling method on the results of fish ectoparasite studies. Common roach Rutilus rutilus were sampled from the same gravel pit in the River Dyje flood plain (Czech Republic) using 3 different sampling methods, i.e. electrofishing, beach seining and gill-netting, and were examined for ectoparasites. Not only did fish caught by electrofishing have more of the most abundant parasites (Trichodina spp., Gyrodactylus spp.) than those caught by beach seining or gill-netting, they also had relatively rich parasite infracommunities,nresulting in a significantly different assemblage composition, presumably as parasites were lost through handling and manipulation’ in the net. Based on this, we recommend electrofishing as the most suitable method to sample fish for parasite community studies, as data from fish caught with gill-nets and beach seines will provide a biased picture of the ectoparasite community, underestimating ectoparasite abundance and infracommunity species richness.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Methodological issues affecting the study of fish parasites. II. Sampling method affects ectoparasite studies

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this study, we assessed the impact of sampling method on the results of fish ectoparasite studies. Common roach Rutilus rutilus were sampled from the same gravel pit in the River Dyje flood plain (Czech Republic) using 3 different sampling methods, i.e. electrofishing, beach seining and gill-netting, and were examined for ectoparasites. Not only did fish caught by electrofishing have more of the most abundant parasites (Trichodina spp., Gyrodactylus spp.) than those caught by beach seining or gill-netting, they also had relatively rich parasite infracommunities,nresulting in a significantly different assemblage composition, presumably as parasites were lost through handling and manipulation’ in the net. Based on this, we recommend electrofishing as the most suitable method to sample fish for parasite community studies, as data from fish caught with gill-nets and beach seines will provide a biased picture of the ectoparasite community, underestimating ectoparasite abundance and infracommunity species richness.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

EG - Zoologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GBP505%2F12%2FG112" target="_blank" >GBP505/12/G112: ECIP - Evropské centrum ichtyoparazitologie</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Diseases of Aquatic Organisms

ISSN

0177-5103

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

121

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

59-66

Kód UT WoS článku

000384243300006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84984922334