Deformational Response of Rocks to Uniaxial, Biaxial, and Triaxial Loading or Unloading Regimes

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68145535%3A_____%2F17%3A00475825" target="_blank" >RIV/68145535:_____/17:00475825 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705817323299" target="_blank" >http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705817323299</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.189" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.189</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Deformational Response of Rocks to Uniaxial, Biaxial, and Triaxial Loading or Unloading Regimes

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In material sciences, it is a well-known fact that linear or linearized theory based on Hooke's law does not offer a satisfactory description of solids in special regimes, which include e.g. too high strains under large uniaxial stresses. Therefore, in general, the response to biaxial or triaxial loading cannot be obtained as superposition of uniaxial load responses. Striking paper book example of material demonstrating such behavior is rubber subjected to uniaxial or isotropic compression. Despite this fact, linear mechanical moduli, being secant or differential, determined through standard rock-mechanics tests, mostly from the uniaxial compression, are still widely used for description of deformational behavior of rocks. Without doubt, an appropriate interpretation of these effective quasi-elastic or stiffness moduli can give useful information about mechanical properties of the rocks, especially in comparative sense. However, for more reliable constitutive modeling of any solid materials, paricularly rocks, an experimental investigation of deformational responses to uniaxial, biaxial and triaxial loading or unloading regimes is very useful. This contribution presents the results of an experimental case study on homogeneous sandstone exposed to isotropic triaxial, and equi-biaxial or uniaxial loading regimes. The measured deformational response of this rock is compared with behavior of elastic solid materials. Finally, benefit of the experimental testing for constitutive modeling based on phenomenological description is briefly discussed.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Deformational Response of Rocks to Uniaxial, Biaxial, and Triaxial Loading or Unloading Regimes

Popis výsledku anglicky

In material sciences, it is a well-known fact that linear or linearized theory based on Hooke's law does not offer a satisfactory description of solids in special regimes, which include e.g. too high strains under large uniaxial stresses. Therefore, in general, the response to biaxial or triaxial loading cannot be obtained as superposition of uniaxial load responses. Striking paper book example of material demonstrating such behavior is rubber subjected to uniaxial or isotropic compression. Despite this fact, linear mechanical moduli, being secant or differential, determined through standard rock-mechanics tests, mostly from the uniaxial compression, are still widely used for description of deformational behavior of rocks. Without doubt, an appropriate interpretation of these effective quasi-elastic or stiffness moduli can give useful information about mechanical properties of the rocks, especially in comparative sense. However, for more reliable constitutive modeling of any solid materials, paricularly rocks, an experimental investigation of deformational responses to uniaxial, biaxial and triaxial loading or unloading regimes is very useful. This contribution presents the results of an experimental case study on homogeneous sandstone exposed to isotropic triaxial, and equi-biaxial or uniaxial loading regimes. The measured deformational response of this rock is compared with behavior of elastic solid materials. Finally, benefit of the experimental testing for constitutive modeling based on phenomenological description is briefly discussed.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20501 - Materials engineering

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Procedia Engineering - ISRM European Rock Mechanics Symposium EUROCK 2017

ISBN

—

ISSN

1877-7058

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

332-341

Název nakladatele

Elsevier Ltd.

Místo vydání

Amsterdam

Místo konání akce

Ostrava

Datum konání akce

20. 6. 2017

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000416996000043