What is the quality of participatory renewable energy planning in Europe? A comparative analysis of innovative practices in 25 projects

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68145535%3A_____%2F21%3A00534377" target="_blank" >RIV/68145535:_____/21:00534377 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629620303790" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629620303790</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101804" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.erss.2020.101804</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

What is the quality of participatory renewable energy planning in Europe? A comparative analysis of innovative practices in 25 projects

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

There is widespread agreement that society must urgently go over to renewable energy and that effective participation is crucial for a sustainable transition. Recent literature highlights that the quality of participatory planning is decisive for the acceptance of renewable energy technologies. However, social science research on the issue is dominated by single case studies and the quality of the participatory processes has been rarely studied across wider regional contexts. We present the results of a comparative qualitative inventory of innovative practices from 25 projects in 12 countries in three supra-national European regions. We assessed participation quality according to three analytical dimensions: rationale, inclusiveness, and participation level. An instru-mental rationale, broad inclusiveness, and a participation level of consulting or informing was a combination that was commonly perceived as an innovative participatory practice in most regional contexts. We found a tendency towards more advanced practices in Western Europe, compared to Southern, and Eastern Europe. However, practices that were considered to be innovative in the latter regions still provide important lessons within their geographical contexts.

Název v anglickém jazyce

What is the quality of participatory renewable energy planning in Europe? A comparative analysis of innovative practices in 25 projects

Popis výsledku anglicky

There is widespread agreement that society must urgently go over to renewable energy and that effective participation is crucial for a sustainable transition. Recent literature highlights that the quality of participatory planning is decisive for the acceptance of renewable energy technologies. However, social science research on the issue is dominated by single case studies and the quality of the participatory processes has been rarely studied across wider regional contexts. We present the results of a comparative qualitative inventory of innovative practices from 25 projects in 12 countries in three supra-national European regions. We assessed participation quality according to three analytical dimensions: rationale, inclusiveness, and participation level. An instru-mental rationale, broad inclusiveness, and a participation level of consulting or informing was a combination that was commonly perceived as an innovative participatory practice in most regional contexts. We found a tendency towards more advanced practices in Western Europe, compared to Southern, and Eastern Europe. However, practices that were considered to be innovative in the latter regions still provide important lessons within their geographical contexts.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50704 - Environmental sciences (social aspects)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA20-11782S" target="_blank" >GA20-11782S: Povaha a dynamika lokálních konfliktů o využití území v polyracionálním prostředí</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Energy Research & Social Science

ISSN

2214-6296

e-ISSN

2214-6326

Svazek periodika

71

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

January 2021

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

101804

Kód UT WoS článku

000629841200005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85093977805