Have Mayors Will Travel: Trends and Direct Election of the Mayor: A Five Nation Study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F16%3A00473695" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/16:00473695 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_17" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_17</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_17" target="_blank" >10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_17</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Have Mayors Will Travel: Trends and Direct Election of the Mayor: A Five Nation Study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Whether citizens should directly elect the mayor or whether only councillors should be able to indirectly choose the local political to the exclusion of the public from the process, is one of the most controversial debates around the reform of local government – at least for policy-makers and councillors. Debates about direct or indirect election of local political leaders focus on different interpretations of political concepts such as: the legitimacy to act, visibility and profile of local leaders, transparency of political decision-making processes, accountability and the role of the citizen in local representative democracy. The chapter takes five European counties selected because of their different political traditions and structures, to assess the nature of the policy debate about the selection of the local political leader. It does this to assess how far path dependent responses to reform have influenced political change or whether crisis moments provide opportunities for new considerations about the reform of local politics to emerge.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Have Mayors Will Travel: Trends and Direct Election of the Mayor: A Five Nation Study
Popis výsledku anglicky
Whether citizens should directly elect the mayor or whether only councillors should be able to indirectly choose the local political to the exclusion of the public from the process, is one of the most controversial debates around the reform of local government – at least for policy-makers and councillors. Debates about direct or indirect election of local political leaders focus on different interpretations of political concepts such as: the legitimacy to act, visibility and profile of local leaders, transparency of political decision-making processes, accountability and the role of the citizen in local representative democracy. The chapter takes five European counties selected because of their different political traditions and structures, to assess the nature of the policy debate about the selection of the local political leader. It does this to assess how far path dependent responses to reform have influenced political change or whether crisis moments provide opportunities for new considerations about the reform of local politics to emerge.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50401 - Sociology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis. National Trajectories and International Comparisons
ISBN
978-1-137-52548-2
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
301-315
Počet stran knihy
366
Název nakladatele
Palgrave Macmillan
Místo vydání
London
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
000399115400018