Multi-scalar geographies of polarisation and peripheralisation: A case study of Czechia
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F17%3A00477448" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/17:00477448 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bog-2017-0029" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bog-2017-0029</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bog-2017-0029" target="_blank" >10.1515/bog-2017-0029</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Multi-scalar geographies of polarisation and peripheralisation: A case study of Czechia
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
A key issue in socio-economic geography is to understand how regional and social polarisation shapes the territorial organisation of society. We argue that effects of polarisation are not translated simply and straightforwardly in a whole region, but vary to a large extent with respect to different types of accessibility areas. We applied the time-accessibility framework to classify a territory into urban, peri-urban, rural, and remote rural areas at a national and regional scale. Subsequently, we computed comparative indicators for this territorial classification, measuring three dimensions of peripherality for a period of thirty years. The analysis illustrates how polarisation and peripheralisation works at a detailed spatial level. A case study of the Ústí region shows re-polarisation and bi-polarisation of the region in its path from socialist urbanisation in the 1980s to regional peripheralisation in 2011. The use of the time-accessibility framework allows to assess regional changes within long-term and broader changes of core-periphery relations at national level and thus allows for a better understanding of the different nature of socialist and post-socialist peripheries. Finally, the article offers methodical procedures and tools allowing for a comparable research of polarisation and peripheralisation. Thus, it is responding to the call for more comparative research of peripheral areas in Europe.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Multi-scalar geographies of polarisation and peripheralisation: A case study of Czechia
Popis výsledku anglicky
A key issue in socio-economic geography is to understand how regional and social polarisation shapes the territorial organisation of society. We argue that effects of polarisation are not translated simply and straightforwardly in a whole region, but vary to a large extent with respect to different types of accessibility areas. We applied the time-accessibility framework to classify a territory into urban, peri-urban, rural, and remote rural areas at a national and regional scale. Subsequently, we computed comparative indicators for this territorial classification, measuring three dimensions of peripherality for a period of thirty years. The analysis illustrates how polarisation and peripheralisation works at a detailed spatial level. A case study of the Ústí region shows re-polarisation and bi-polarisation of the region in its path from socialist urbanisation in the 1980s to regional peripheralisation in 2011. The use of the time-accessibility framework allows to assess regional changes within long-term and broader changes of core-periphery relations at national level and thus allows for a better understanding of the different nature of socialist and post-socialist peripheries. Finally, the article offers methodical procedures and tools allowing for a comparable research of polarisation and peripheralisation. Thus, it is responding to the call for more comparative research of peripheral areas in Europe.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50401 - Sociology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA15-10602S" target="_blank" >GA15-10602S: Socio-prostorové znevýhodnění obyvatel periferních venkovských oblastí</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Bulletin of Geography. Socio–economic Series
ISSN
1732-4254
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
16
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
37
Stát vydavatele periodika
PL - Polská republika
Počet stran výsledku
14
Strana od-do
125-137
Kód UT WoS článku
000414672800009
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85040448322