Housing restitution policies among post-socialist countries: explaining divergence.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F17%3A00480006" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/17:00480006 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2016.1246602" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2016.1246602</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2016.1246602" target="_blank" >10.1080/14616718.2016.1246602</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Housing restitution policies among post-socialist countries: explaining divergence.

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The purpose of this paper is to explain why post-socialist countries adopted different housing restitution strategies after the change of regimes across the region. Restitution refers here to the process of returning property or compensating for property expropriated by the communist regime to its previous owners or their descendants. This paper provides a brief overview, assessment and categorisation of housing property restitution policies using a sample of 14 post-socialist countries, but it primarily aims to contribute to the general understanding of the evolution of post-socialist housing systems. The authors demonstrate that the decision of governments whether or not to adopt a policy of mass give-away privatisation of public housing probably had the biggest impact on which property restitution strategy, if any, was applied.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Housing restitution policies among post-socialist countries: explaining divergence.

Popis výsledku anglicky

The purpose of this paper is to explain why post-socialist countries adopted different housing restitution strategies after the change of regimes across the region. Restitution refers here to the process of returning property or compensating for property expropriated by the communist regime to its previous owners or their descendants. This paper provides a brief overview, assessment and categorisation of housing property restitution policies using a sample of 14 post-socialist countries, but it primarily aims to contribute to the general understanding of the evolution of post-socialist housing systems. The authors demonstrate that the decision of governments whether or not to adopt a policy of mass give-away privatisation of public housing probably had the biggest impact on which property restitution strategy, if any, was applied.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA16-06335S" target="_blank" >GA16-06335S: Rizika a důsledky využití investic domácností do bydlení pro zvýšení příjmů v důchodovém věku</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Housing Policy

ISSN

1461-6718

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

145-156

Kód UT WoS článku

000396618800008

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84992518962