Czech and Polish understanding of democracy
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F18%3A00499659" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/18:00499659 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssp.2018.4.5" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssp.2018.4.5</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssp.2018.4.5" target="_blank" >10.14746/ssp.2018.4.5</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Czech and Polish understanding of democracy
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper attempts to analyze the results of the European Social Survey Round 6 (2012, 2013), focusing on the section related to how democracy is understood in Poland and in the Czech Republic. The most interesting issue encompassed the differences in how democracy is defined in the two countries and the outcomes these differences produce in terms of the perceived legitimacy of the system, as well as demographic factors that correlate with differences in the understanding of democracy in both surveyed groups. Statistical analyses carried out in the paper indicated the presence of different definitions of democracy formulated in Poland and in the Czech Republic (the Czechs gave stronger emphasis to the liberal aspect of democracy, whereas Poles stressed its social aspects more). Nevertheless, the relationship between the definition of democracy and the perceived level of legitimacy of the democratic system (for dispersed and specific legitimacy alike) were found to be relatively weak, as was the case of the relationship between the understanding of democracy, system legitimacy and socio-demographic factors. The only factor found to be significant for the perceived level of legitimacy of the democratic system concerned the level of satisfaction with one’s own material situation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Czech and Polish understanding of democracy
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper attempts to analyze the results of the European Social Survey Round 6 (2012, 2013), focusing on the section related to how democracy is understood in Poland and in the Czech Republic. The most interesting issue encompassed the differences in how democracy is defined in the two countries and the outcomes these differences produce in terms of the perceived legitimacy of the system, as well as demographic factors that correlate with differences in the understanding of democracy in both surveyed groups. Statistical analyses carried out in the paper indicated the presence of different definitions of democracy formulated in Poland and in the Czech Republic (the Czechs gave stronger emphasis to the liberal aspect of democracy, whereas Poles stressed its social aspects more). Nevertheless, the relationship between the definition of democracy and the perceived level of legitimacy of the democratic system (for dispersed and specific legitimacy alike) were found to be relatively weak, as was the case of the relationship between the understanding of democracy, system legitimacy and socio-demographic factors. The only factor found to be significant for the perceived level of legitimacy of the democratic system concerned the level of satisfaction with one’s own material situation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LM2015066" target="_blank" >LM2015066: Český národní uzel ESS (European Social Survey)</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne
ISSN
1731-7517
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
16
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
PL - Polská republika
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
95-112
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—