Where Have All the Rural Poor Gone? Explaining the Rural–Urban Poverty Gap in European Countries

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F19%3A00507755" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/19:00507755 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/soru.12235" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/soru.12235</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soru.12235" target="_blank" >10.1111/soru.12235</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Where Have All the Rural Poor Gone? Explaining the Rural–Urban Poverty Gap in European Countries

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article contributes to explanations of rural poverty and deprivation by focusing on the rural–urban poverty and deprivation gap in European countries. Using European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions data, it confirms, convincingly, the limited validity of the argument for universally increased poverty and deprivation levels in rural areas in Europe, and demonstrates that the disparities are related to four theoretically elaborated factors: increased rural poverty can be observed in countries with lower rural population densities, in countries with a higher proportion of farmers, in post‐socialist transition countries, and in countries with generally lower economic development levels and decreased living standards. In particular, national economic development appears to be the essential factor behind rural disadvantage. Three interrelated negative processes have been revealed in the countryside of poor European countries: an increased concentration of low‐resource households, a higher poverty risk to these households, and additional poverty‐enhancing effects that operate independently of household resources. These direct rural effects are strongly conditioned by the national economic advancement and related urbanisation processes.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Where Have All the Rural Poor Gone? Explaining the Rural–Urban Poverty Gap in European Countries

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article contributes to explanations of rural poverty and deprivation by focusing on the rural–urban poverty and deprivation gap in European countries. Using European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions data, it confirms, convincingly, the limited validity of the argument for universally increased poverty and deprivation levels in rural areas in Europe, and demonstrates that the disparities are related to four theoretically elaborated factors: increased rural poverty can be observed in countries with lower rural population densities, in countries with a higher proportion of farmers, in post‐socialist transition countries, and in countries with generally lower economic development levels and decreased living standards. In particular, national economic development appears to be the essential factor behind rural disadvantage. Three interrelated negative processes have been revealed in the countryside of poor European countries: an increased concentration of low‐resource households, a higher poverty risk to these households, and additional poverty‐enhancing effects that operate independently of household resources. These direct rural effects are strongly conditioned by the national economic advancement and related urbanisation processes.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GC18-05704J" target="_blank" >GC18-05704J: Sociální znevýhodnění na periferním venkově v Česku a ve východním Německu: struktury příležitostí a individuální strategie ve srovnávací perspektivě</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Sociologia Ruralis

ISSN

0038-0199

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

59

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

369-392

Kód UT WoS článku

000478097700002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85065673404