Sustainable Governance in the Context of the COVID-19 Crisis. Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F21%3A00549652" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/21:00549652 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sgi-network.org/docs/2021/country/SGI2021_Czechia.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.sgi-network.org/docs/2021/country/SGI2021_Czechia.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Sustainable Governance in the Context of the COVID-19 Crisis. Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

EU and OECD countries vary considerably in terms of their pre-crisis socioeconomic conditions. Their capacity for political reform also varies widely. These differences are likely to grow as the COVID-19 crisis continues. The country chapter is part of the cross-national comparative review of 29 OECD and EU countries which aim is a systematic comparison of COVID-19 crisis resilience. The guiding questions are:n• How well do democratic checks and balances function in a crisis?n• How well-organized is the political process of crisis management? n• How vulnerable are economic, health and social security systems? n• How effective and sustainable is the crisis response? nnDriven by evidence-based analyses, the SGI helps a variety of stakeholders throughout the OECD and EU to navigate the complexity of effective governance. The question is: what works/ doesn´t works, in which context and why? Answering these questions can help generate innovative responses to cross-cutting challenges worldwide. The study enables to examine the Czech Republic from the comparative perspective because the study is based on the same methodology and use of OECD statistical database completed by national data.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Sustainable Governance in the Context of the COVID-19 Crisis. Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

EU and OECD countries vary considerably in terms of their pre-crisis socioeconomic conditions. Their capacity for political reform also varies widely. These differences are likely to grow as the COVID-19 crisis continues. The country chapter is part of the cross-national comparative review of 29 OECD and EU countries which aim is a systematic comparison of COVID-19 crisis resilience. The guiding questions are:n• How well do democratic checks and balances function in a crisis?n• How well-organized is the political process of crisis management? n• How vulnerable are economic, health and social security systems? n• How effective and sustainable is the crisis response? nnDriven by evidence-based analyses, the SGI helps a variety of stakeholders throughout the OECD and EU to navigate the complexity of effective governance. The question is: what works/ doesn´t works, in which context and why? Answering these questions can help generate innovative responses to cross-cutting challenges worldwide. The study enables to examine the Czech Republic from the comparative perspective because the study is based on the same methodology and use of OECD statistical database completed by national data.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů