Bridging Economics and Sociology: Responses to a Critique of Pragmatic Socioeconomics

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F22%3A00556837" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/22:00556837 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/61989592:15210/22:73614267

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14036096.2021.2022753" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14036096.2021.2022753</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2021.2022753" target="_blank" >10.1080/14036096.2021.2022753</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Bridging Economics and Sociology: Responses to a Critique of Pragmatic Socioeconomics

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In our Focus article we introduced pragmatic socioeconomics, a methodological and theoretical approach that we believe may create a more solid interdisciplinary bridge between sociology and mainstream economics. This paper reacts on the critical review of our approach by six academics recognised in the field. We devoted the most space to those comments that uncovered the blank spots in our approach or areas that we had poorly addressed. We better defined the position of pragmatic socioeconomic towards 'grand naratives', traditional economics, economic sociology or new institutional economics. Our new program certainly has a long road ahead of it before it can prove its value. Along the way it will have to deal with both unfair accusations and justified criticisms highlighting areas where it is theoretically and methodologically unclear just as we have tried to deal with these criticisms in this paper. Whatever its future is, we hope that this paper is opening up an important interdisciplinary discussion much needed in housing studies.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Bridging Economics and Sociology: Responses to a Critique of Pragmatic Socioeconomics

Popis výsledku anglicky

In our Focus article we introduced pragmatic socioeconomics, a methodological and theoretical approach that we believe may create a more solid interdisciplinary bridge between sociology and mainstream economics. This paper reacts on the critical review of our approach by six academics recognised in the field. We devoted the most space to those comments that uncovered the blank spots in our approach or areas that we had poorly addressed. We better defined the position of pragmatic socioeconomic towards 'grand naratives', traditional economics, economic sociology or new institutional economics. Our new program certainly has a long road ahead of it before it can prove its value. Along the way it will have to deal with both unfair accusations and justified criticisms highlighting areas where it is theoretically and methodologically unclear just as we have tried to deal with these criticisms in this paper. Whatever its future is, we hope that this paper is opening up an important interdisciplinary discussion much needed in housing studies.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-07402S" target="_blank" >GA19-07402S: Dráhy bydlení miléniálů: Rostoucí napětí mezi normalizací vlastnického bydlení a zhoršující se finanční dostupností bydlení v ČR</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Housing, Theory and Society

ISSN

1403-6096

e-ISSN

1651-2278

Svazek periodika

39

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

SE - Švédské království

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

180-199

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85128408600