When ethnicity is “national”: mapping ethnic minorities in Europe’s framework convention for the protection of national minorities

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378076%3A_____%2F24%3A00584652" target="_blank" >RIV/68378076:_____/24:00584652 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01419870.2024.2328338?scroll=top&needAccess=true" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01419870.2024.2328338?scroll=top&needAccess=true</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2024.2328338" target="_blank" >10.1080/01419870.2024.2328338</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

When ethnicity is “national”: mapping ethnic minorities in Europe’s framework convention for the protection of national minorities

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Legal and policy categorizations of group belonging play an important role in analysing lived experiences of discrimination, since the scope of minority protection requires individuals to prove their belonging to a minority group. This article maps the existing classifiers of minority identification as they are used in the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, Europe’s most comprehensive treaty designed to protect the rights of national minorities. I engage with the concept of ethnicity as a “knot of distinction”, looking at which minorities qualify as “national” in different countries. When is ethnicity used as a proxy for religion, when for race, and when for language? What categories are omitted? By inductively analysing the rationales presented by different EU countries of which minorities are “national”, and based on which grounds, this article reveals a messy, historically and politically driven picture, but one that can help us understand some regional patterns.

Název v anglickém jazyce

When ethnicity is “national”: mapping ethnic minorities in Europe’s framework convention for the protection of national minorities

Popis výsledku anglicky

Legal and policy categorizations of group belonging play an important role in analysing lived experiences of discrimination, since the scope of minority protection requires individuals to prove their belonging to a minority group. This article maps the existing classifiers of minority identification as they are used in the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, Europe’s most comprehensive treaty designed to protect the rights of national minorities. I engage with the concept of ethnicity as a “knot of distinction”, looking at which minorities qualify as “national” in different countries. When is ethnicity used as a proxy for religion, when for race, and when for language? What categories are omitted? By inductively analysing the rationales presented by different EU countries of which minorities are “national”, and based on which grounds, this article reveals a messy, historically and politically driven picture, but one that can help us understand some regional patterns.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50901 - Other social sciences

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ethnic and Racial Studies

ISSN

0141-9870

e-ISSN

1466-4356

Svazek periodika

47

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

9

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

1812-1833

Kód UT WoS článku

001190719300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85187918761