Post-Dissident Politics and the “Liberal Consensus” in East-Central Europe after 1989

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378114%3A_____%2F24%3A00602666" target="_blank" >RIV/68378114:_____/24:00602666 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/08883254231196319?journalCode=eepa" target="_blank" >https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/08883254231196319?journalCode=eepa</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08883254231196" target="_blank" >10.1177/08883254231196</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Post-Dissident Politics and the “Liberal Consensus” in East-Central Europe after 1989

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article’s central question is how former dissidents and their engagement in post-1989 nascent democratic politics contributed to the emergence of what was later retrospectively labelled the “liberal consensus.” I look at the earliest stages of this consensus before it started to lock in the conditionality of the EU accession process. To this end, I first discuss the “liberal consensus” from a retrospective and past prospective perspective. I define the notions of “post-dissent” and liberal politics emerging after 1989 on the dissident platform. I discuss the theoretical background and historical contours of the notion of dissident “politics of consensus.” The empirical core of the study is an analysis of the birth of post-dissident liberal parties in the process of the disintegration of broad consensual democratization movements of the 1989 revolutions. The study offers a comparison of the Czech, Slovak, Hungarian, and Polish cases, analyzing their similarities and less obvious but significant differences.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Post-Dissident Politics and the “Liberal Consensus” in East-Central Europe after 1989

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article’s central question is how former dissidents and their engagement in post-1989 nascent democratic politics contributed to the emergence of what was later retrospectively labelled the “liberal consensus.” I look at the earliest stages of this consensus before it started to lock in the conditionality of the EU accession process. To this end, I first discuss the “liberal consensus” from a retrospective and past prospective perspective. I define the notions of “post-dissent” and liberal politics emerging after 1989 on the dissident platform. I discuss the theoretical background and historical contours of the notion of dissident “politics of consensus.” The empirical core of the study is an analysis of the birth of post-dissident liberal parties in the process of the disintegration of broad consensual democratization movements of the 1989 revolutions. The study offers a comparison of the Czech, Slovak, Hungarian, and Polish cases, analyzing their similarities and less obvious but significant differences.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA22-05450S" target="_blank" >GA22-05450S: Dějiny Charty 77 v domácí a transnacionální perspektivě</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

East European Politics and Societies

ISSN

0888-3254

e-ISSN

1533-8371

Svazek periodika

38

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

36

Strana od-do

758-793

Kód UT WoS článku

001348063400004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85208805741