Expertise and Conflicts in State Business Management During the Era of “Normalisation” in Czechoslovakia: Pluralism or Corporatism?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378114%3A_____%2F25%3A00642903" target="_blank" >RIV/68378114:_____/25:00642903 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://journals.muni.cz/socialni_studia" target="_blank" >https://journals.muni.cz/socialni_studia</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/SOC2025-41006" target="_blank" >10.5817/SOC2025-41006</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Expertise and Conflicts in State Business Management During the Era of “Normalisation” in Czechoslovakia: Pluralism or Corporatism?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The socialist industrial managers were a specific elite group within Czechoslovak society. During the era of normalisation, their position was so solid that they could assertively manifest particular interests. At the same time, they were confronted with the demands of various political circumstances. First of all, they were bound by the production plan, which was set by the ministries for individual production sectors. At the same time, the functioning of enterprises was connected to the system of state administration. Most notably, the factories were under the steady control of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia. This article ponders the uneasy relations of directors with multiple centres of power: the ministries, societal organizations, and both local and central organs of the Communist Party. The focus on “interests”, “groups”, and “conflict” reintroduces classic debate between proponents of pluralism and corporatism – both addressing the mode of interest representation. The core of the text, based on research on the realities of one particular factory, is a discussion on the conflict between ideological and technocratic/expert demands which directors were supposed to deal with.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Expertise and Conflicts in State Business Management During the Era of “Normalisation” in Czechoslovakia: Pluralism or Corporatism?
Popis výsledku anglicky
The socialist industrial managers were a specific elite group within Czechoslovak society. During the era of normalisation, their position was so solid that they could assertively manifest particular interests. At the same time, they were confronted with the demands of various political circumstances. First of all, they were bound by the production plan, which was set by the ministries for individual production sectors. At the same time, the functioning of enterprises was connected to the system of state administration. Most notably, the factories were under the steady control of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia. This article ponders the uneasy relations of directors with multiple centres of power: the ministries, societal organizations, and both local and central organs of the Communist Party. The focus on “interests”, “groups”, and “conflict” reintroduces classic debate between proponents of pluralism and corporatism – both addressing the mode of interest representation. The core of the text, based on research on the realities of one particular factory, is a discussion on the conflict between ideological and technocratic/expert demands which directors were supposed to deal with.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Sociální studia
ISSN
1214-813X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
22
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
16
Strana od-do
33-48
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105016108556