The Paradox of Human Rights and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Keeping it Alive

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378122%3A_____%2F17%3A00478679" target="_blank" >RIV/68378122:_____/17:00478679 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Paradox of Human Rights and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Keeping it Alive

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This chapter analyses human rights in post-national contexts and demonstrates, through the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, that the Margin of Appreciation doctrine is an essential part of human rights adjudication. Current approaches have tended to stress the instrumental value of the Margin of Appreciation, or to give it a complementary role within the principle of proportionality, while others have been wholly critical of it. In contradiction to these approaches this chapter shows that the doctrine is a genuinely normative principle capable of balancing conflicting values. It explores to what extent the tension between human rights and politics, embodied in the doctrine, might be understood as a mutually reinforcing interplay of variables rather than an entrenched separation. By linking the interpretation of the Margin of Appreciation doctrine to a broader conception of human rights, understood as complex political and moral norms, this chapter e argues that the doctrine can assist in the formulation of the common good in light of the requirements of the Convention.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Paradox of Human Rights and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Keeping it Alive

Popis výsledku anglicky

This chapter analyses human rights in post-national contexts and demonstrates, through the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, that the Margin of Appreciation doctrine is an essential part of human rights adjudication. Current approaches have tended to stress the instrumental value of the Margin of Appreciation, or to give it a complementary role within the principle of proportionality, while others have been wholly critical of it. In contradiction to these approaches this chapter shows that the doctrine is a genuinely normative principle capable of balancing conflicting values. It explores to what extent the tension between human rights and politics, embodied in the doctrine, might be understood as a mutually reinforcing interplay of variables rather than an entrenched separation. By linking the interpretation of the Margin of Appreciation doctrine to a broader conception of human rights, understood as complex political and moral norms, this chapter e argues that the doctrine can assist in the formulation of the common good in light of the requirements of the Convention.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA13-30299S" target="_blank" >GA13-30299S: Lidská práva v mezikulturních perspektivách</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Human Rights Between Law and Politics. The Margin of Appreciation in Post-National Contexts

ISBN

978-1-84946-865-7

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

169-184

Počet stran knihy

208

Název nakladatele

Hart Publishing

Místo vydání

Oxford

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—