Precipitation variability in CMIP6 climate models across the North Atlantic–European region and their Links to Atmospheric Circulation
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378289%3A_____%2F25%3A00605012" target="_blank" >RIV/68378289:_____/25:00605012 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/86652079:_____/25:00643863
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00382-024-07556-w" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00382-024-07556-w</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-024-07556-w" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00382-024-07556-w</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Precipitation variability in CMIP6 climate models across the North Atlantic–European region and their Links to Atmospheric Circulation
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Long-term changes in climate variability represent an important aspect of climate change, with various impacts on society and environment. In this study, we analyze outputs from 13 CMIP6 global climate models (GCMs) across the North Atlantic–European domain, focusing on their simulations of precipitation probability and short-term variability in both historical and future climates. Precipitation probability denotes the probability of a wet day (> 1 mm), and precipitation variability reflects the tendency to cluster wet days into sequences. By comparing against the ERA5 reanalysis, we found that the GCMs tend to overestimate precipitation probability across Europe in winter, whereas in summer, they have a tendency to underestimate it around 50°N. Precipitation variability is, on average, underestimated by the GCMs in summer, while overestimated in several regions in winter. Projections for the end of the twenty-first century indicate significant changes in both precipitation probability and variability which are more pronounced under the more pessimistic emission scenario compared to the moderate one. We found that the changes in probability and variability are mutually independent: the former being more latitudinal-dependent while the latter differs between the west and east. After identifying atmospheric circulation conducive and non-conducive to precipitation occurrence, we found that GCMs overestimating the frequency of conducive circulation tend to overestimate precipitation probability, and vice versa. Furthermore, increased precipitation variability is associated with higher circulation variability. Finally, our analysis reveals that projected changes in precipitation probability and variability are often linked to projected changes in atmospheric circulation, especially in winter.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Precipitation variability in CMIP6 climate models across the North Atlantic–European region and their Links to Atmospheric Circulation
Popis výsledku anglicky
Long-term changes in climate variability represent an important aspect of climate change, with various impacts on society and environment. In this study, we analyze outputs from 13 CMIP6 global climate models (GCMs) across the North Atlantic–European domain, focusing on their simulations of precipitation probability and short-term variability in both historical and future climates. Precipitation probability denotes the probability of a wet day (> 1 mm), and precipitation variability reflects the tendency to cluster wet days into sequences. By comparing against the ERA5 reanalysis, we found that the GCMs tend to overestimate precipitation probability across Europe in winter, whereas in summer, they have a tendency to underestimate it around 50°N. Precipitation variability is, on average, underestimated by the GCMs in summer, while overestimated in several regions in winter. Projections for the end of the twenty-first century indicate significant changes in both precipitation probability and variability which are more pronounced under the more pessimistic emission scenario compared to the moderate one. We found that the changes in probability and variability are mutually independent: the former being more latitudinal-dependent while the latter differs between the west and east. After identifying atmospheric circulation conducive and non-conducive to precipitation occurrence, we found that GCMs overestimating the frequency of conducive circulation tend to overestimate precipitation probability, and vice versa. Furthermore, increased precipitation variability is associated with higher circulation variability. Finally, our analysis reveals that projected changes in precipitation probability and variability are often linked to projected changes in atmospheric circulation, especially in winter.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10510 - Climatic research
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Climate Dynamics
ISSN
0930-7575
e-ISSN
1432-0894
Svazek periodika
63
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
98
Kód UT WoS článku
001405096800001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85217559040