Wind tunnel tests applied to wind energy management: comparison of measurements in closed-circuit and open-circuit wind tunnels
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378297%3A_____%2F20%3A00535637" target="_blank" >RIV/68378297:_____/20:00535637 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj18.296" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj18.296</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24084/repqj18.296" target="_blank" >10.24084/repqj18.296</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Wind tunnel tests applied to wind energy management: comparison of measurements in closed-circuit and open-circuit wind tunnels
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Power loss, damages overestimation and environmental impacts are the main problems related to wind energy and its planning and management. One of the tools used to analyse and manage this problem is the aerodynamic wind tunnel. In this work wind tunnel tests were performed in two different facilities, an open-circuit wind tunnel and a close-circuit wind tunnel, in order to study the suitability of these features to optimize wind farms layout and power quality and its dependence of the type of tests facility. Experimental results in this work are reported as wind speed and turbulence intensity vertical profiles and flow fields with a simulated ABL with and without the presence of a three-bladed wind turbine model. Results show that mean wind velocity is similar in both tunnels, but turbulence intensity is higher for the open-circuit wind tunnel.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Wind tunnel tests applied to wind energy management: comparison of measurements in closed-circuit and open-circuit wind tunnels
Popis výsledku anglicky
Power loss, damages overestimation and environmental impacts are the main problems related to wind energy and its planning and management. One of the tools used to analyse and manage this problem is the aerodynamic wind tunnel. In this work wind tunnel tests were performed in two different facilities, an open-circuit wind tunnel and a close-circuit wind tunnel, in order to study the suitability of these features to optimize wind farms layout and power quality and its dependence of the type of tests facility. Experimental results in this work are reported as wind speed and turbulence intensity vertical profiles and flow fields with a simulated ABL with and without the presence of a three-bladed wind turbine model. Results show that mean wind velocity is similar in both tunnels, but turbulence intensity is higher for the open-circuit wind tunnel.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20101 - Civil engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal
ISSN
2172-038X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
18
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
June
Stát vydavatele periodika
ES - Španělské království
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
272-275
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85091636038