Limited applicability of cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses for the optimization of radon remedial measures

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F10%3A00174048" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/10:00174048 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/86652052:_____/10:#0000047

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Limited applicability of cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses for the optimization of radon remedial measures

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Ways of using different decision-aiding techniques for optimizing and evaluating radon remedial measures have been studied on a large set of data obtained from the remediation of 32 houses with an original indoor radon level (RC) above 1000 Bq/m3. Detailed information about RC before and after remediation, type of remedial measures and installation and operation costs were used as the input for a cost-benefit analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis, in order to find out whether these techniques provide sufficient and relevant information for improving and optimizing remediation. Our study showed that the installation costs of remediation do not depend on the original indoor RC, but on the technical state of the building. CB and CE analysis lead to the conclusion that remedial measures reducing the indoor RC from values above 1000 Bq/m3 are always reasonable. On the other hand, they can neither help to choose the proper remedial measure nor to improve remediation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Limited applicability of cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses for the optimization of radon remedial measures

Popis výsledku anglicky

Ways of using different decision-aiding techniques for optimizing and evaluating radon remedial measures have been studied on a large set of data obtained from the remediation of 32 houses with an original indoor radon level (RC) above 1000 Bq/m3. Detailed information about RC before and after remediation, type of remedial measures and installation and operation costs were used as the input for a cost-benefit analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis, in order to find out whether these techniques provide sufficient and relevant information for improving and optimizing remediation. Our study showed that the installation costs of remediation do not depend on the original indoor RC, but on the technical state of the building. CB and CE analysis lead to the conclusion that remedial measures reducing the indoor RC from values above 1000 Bq/m3 are always reasonable. On the other hand, they can neither help to choose the proper remedial measure nor to improve remediation.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

JN - Stavebnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/JC_09%2F2006" target="_blank" >JC_09/2006: Zajištění úkolů Radonového programu ČR vyplývajícího z požadavků na změnu systému vyhledávání a na zhodnocení jeho efektivit</a><br>

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Hazardous Materials

ISSN

0304-3894

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

182

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1-3

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000282240800057

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—