Hillslope Runoff Generation - Comparing Different Modeling Approaches

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F12%3A00193575" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/12:00193575 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10098-012-0007-2" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10098-012-0007-2</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10098-012-0007-2" target="_blank" >10.2478/v10098-012-0007-2</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Hillslope Runoff Generation - Comparing Different Modeling Approaches

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This study focuses on modeling hydrological responses of shallow hillslope soil in a headwater catchment. The research is conducted using data from the experimental site Uhlířská in Jizera Mountains, Czech Republic. To compare different approaches of runoff generation modeling, three models were used: (1) one-dimensional variably saturated flow model S1D, based on the dual-continuum formulation of Richards' equation; (2) zero-dimensional nonlinear morphological element model GEOTRANSF; and (3) semi-distributed model utilizing the topographic index similarity assumption - TOPMODEL. Hillslope runoff hydrographs and soil water storage variations predicted by the simplified catchment scale models (GEOTRANSF and TOPMODEL) were compared with the respective responses generated by the more physically based local scale model S1D. Both models, GEOTRANSF and TOPMODEL, were found to predict general trends of hydrographs quite satisfactorily; however their ability to correctly predict soil water st

Název v anglickém jazyce

Hillslope Runoff Generation - Comparing Different Modeling Approaches

Popis výsledku anglicky

This study focuses on modeling hydrological responses of shallow hillslope soil in a headwater catchment. The research is conducted using data from the experimental site Uhlířská in Jizera Mountains, Czech Republic. To compare different approaches of runoff generation modeling, three models were used: (1) one-dimensional variably saturated flow model S1D, based on the dual-continuum formulation of Richards' equation; (2) zero-dimensional nonlinear morphological element model GEOTRANSF; and (3) semi-distributed model utilizing the topographic index similarity assumption - TOPMODEL. Hillslope runoff hydrographs and soil water storage variations predicted by the simplified catchment scale models (GEOTRANSF and TOPMODEL) were compared with the respective responses generated by the more physically based local scale model S1D. Both models, GEOTRANSF and TOPMODEL, were found to predict general trends of hydrographs quite satisfactorily; however their ability to correctly predict soil water st

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

DA - Hydrologie a limnologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics

ISSN

0042-790X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

60

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

73-86

Kód UT WoS článku

000305670200001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—