Life Cycle Assessment Comparison of Photocatalytic Coating and Air Purifier
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F16%3A00300019" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/16:00300019 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/68407700:21220/16:00300019
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ieam.1786/abstract" target="_blank" >http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ieam.1786/abstract</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1786" target="_blank" >10.1002/ieam.1786</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Life Cycle Assessment Comparison of Photocatalytic Coating and Air Purifier
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article presents a comparison of 2 very different options for removal of undesirable microorganisms and airborne pollutants from the indoor environment of hospitals, schools, homes, and other enclosed spaces using air purifiers and photocatalytic coatings based on nano titanium dioxide (TiO2). Both products were assessed by life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology from cradle-to-grave. The assessment also includes comparison of 2 different nano TiO2 production technologies, one by continuous hydrothermal synthesis and the other by a sulfate process. Results of the study showed a relatively large contribution of photocatalytic coatings to reducing the effects of selected indices in comparison with an air purifier, regardless of which nano TiO2 production method is used. Although the impacts of the sulfate process are significantly lower compared to those of hydrothermal synthesis when viewed in terms of production alone, taken in the context of the entire product life cycle, the net difference becomes less significant. The study has been elaborated within the Sustainable Hydrothermal Manufacturing of Nanomaterials (SHYMAN) project, which aims to develop competitive and sustainable continuous nanoparticle (NP) production technology based on supercritical hydrothermal synthesis.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Life Cycle Assessment Comparison of Photocatalytic Coating and Air Purifier
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article presents a comparison of 2 very different options for removal of undesirable microorganisms and airborne pollutants from the indoor environment of hospitals, schools, homes, and other enclosed spaces using air purifiers and photocatalytic coatings based on nano titanium dioxide (TiO2). Both products were assessed by life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology from cradle-to-grave. The assessment also includes comparison of 2 different nano TiO2 production technologies, one by continuous hydrothermal synthesis and the other by a sulfate process. Results of the study showed a relatively large contribution of photocatalytic coatings to reducing the effects of selected indices in comparison with an air purifier, regardless of which nano TiO2 production method is used. Although the impacts of the sulfate process are significantly lower compared to those of hydrothermal synthesis when viewed in terms of production alone, taken in the context of the entire product life cycle, the net difference becomes less significant. The study has been elaborated within the Sustainable Hydrothermal Manufacturing of Nanomaterials (SHYMAN) project, which aims to develop competitive and sustainable continuous nanoparticle (NP) production technology based on supercritical hydrothermal synthesis.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
21001 - Nano-materials (production and properties)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/7E12084" target="_blank" >7E12084: Sustainable HydrothermaI Manufacturing of Nanomaterials</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
ISSN
1551-3777
e-ISSN
1551-3793
Svazek periodika
12
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
478-485
Kód UT WoS článku
000379549300010
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84976641763