Adjustment and testing comparison of absolute gravimeters in November 2013
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F17%3A00313094" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/17:00313094 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/gi" target="_blank" >https://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/gi</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14311/gi.16.1.5" target="_blank" >10.14311/gi.16.1.5</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Adjustment and testing comparison of absolute gravimeters in November 2013
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper is focused on a comparison measurement processing of absolute gravimeters in 2013. The comparison deals with a number of various types of absolute gravimeters and includes also an absolute gravimeter from Geodetic observatory Pecný. Comparative measurements are performed to detect systematic errors of gravimeters. A result of processing is most likely value of a gravity and a systematic error of individual devices. Measured values are input to a adjustment with condition a sum of systematic errors is zero. A part of this process is also verification following output: (i) value of a posteriori standard deviation, (ii) size of corrections and (iii) statistical significance of systematic errors. The results of adjustment are 15 gravity values on the reference places and 25 systematic errors of measuring instruments. Result shows that the presence of systematic errors in measurements is not statistically provable because the systematic errors are similarly sized as their standard deviation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Adjustment and testing comparison of absolute gravimeters in November 2013
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper is focused on a comparison measurement processing of absolute gravimeters in 2013. The comparison deals with a number of various types of absolute gravimeters and includes also an absolute gravimeter from Geodetic observatory Pecný. Comparative measurements are performed to detect systematic errors of gravimeters. A result of processing is most likely value of a gravity and a systematic error of individual devices. Measured values are input to a adjustment with condition a sum of systematic errors is zero. A part of this process is also verification following output: (i) value of a posteriori standard deviation, (ii) size of corrections and (iii) statistical significance of systematic errors. The results of adjustment are 15 gravity values on the reference places and 25 systematic errors of measuring instruments. Result shows that the presence of systematic errors in measurements is not statistically provable because the systematic errors are similarly sized as their standard deviation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10500 - Earth and related environmental sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Geoinformatics
ISSN
1802-2669
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
16
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
79-89
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—