Analysis of Tools for Revitalization and Rehabilitation of Brownfields

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F17%3A00334141" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/17:00334141 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.atiner.gr/papers/PLA2017-2318.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.atiner.gr/papers/PLA2017-2318.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

čeština

Název v původním jazyce

Analysis of Tools for Revitalization and Rehabilitation of Brownfields

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This work focuses on answering the difficult question of how we can work with brownfields and it deals with tools that enable the revitalization and rehabilitation projects in the area. The aim of this work is to identify, classify and analyze these instruments. It studies instruments from several countries with long-term experience with this issue (eg. France, Great Britain, Germany, Denmark, Czech Republic) and analyze their contribution and the feasibility of their implementation in other countries. The conclusion is that the tools can be divided into several categories from different perspectives: Strategic tools, Legislative tools, Spatial planning tools, Economic tools, Construction tools, Organizational tools, Information tools, Education tools, Contractual tools, Heritage tools and Rating tools. This leads to situation where the issue of brownfields is often handled by numerous institutions and instruments which could complicate the process. Some of the tools (especially the Economic and Legislative ones) are country-specific and cannot be that easily implemented, however some effective tools (for example Organization, Information and Education tools) don´t require any legislative background and can be therefore easily used by any country to help their brownfield revitalization and rehabilitation process.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Analysis of Tools for Revitalization and Rehabilitation of Brownfields

Popis výsledku anglicky

This work focuses on answering the difficult question of how we can work with brownfields and it deals with tools that enable the revitalization and rehabilitation projects in the area. The aim of this work is to identify, classify and analyze these instruments. It studies instruments from several countries with long-term experience with this issue (eg. France, Great Britain, Germany, Denmark, Czech Republic) and analyze their contribution and the feasibility of their implementation in other countries. The conclusion is that the tools can be divided into several categories from different perspectives: Strategic tools, Legislative tools, Spatial planning tools, Economic tools, Construction tools, Organizational tools, Information tools, Education tools, Contractual tools, Heritage tools and Rating tools. This leads to situation where the issue of brownfields is often handled by numerous institutions and instruments which could complicate the process. Some of the tools (especially the Economic and Legislative ones) are country-specific and cannot be that easily implemented, however some effective tools (for example Organization, Information and Education tools) don´t require any legislative background and can be therefore easily used by any country to help their brownfield revitalization and rehabilitation process.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60500 - Other Humanities and the Arts

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Athens: ATINER'S Conference Paper

ISBN

—

ISSN

2241-2891

e-ISSN

2241-2891

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

3-20

Název nakladatele

Athens Institute for Education & Research

Místo vydání

—

Místo konání akce

Atény

Datum konání akce

19. 6. 2017

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—